Also no one in the US is being denied access to health care. What the issue at hand is the cost of that health care and who pays for it.

http://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/human-rights/

That’s not a factual statement. That’s an opinion.

You’re gonna need to try harder - you’ve fallen into emotion appeals without any clear support. I did a 10k brewery run this morning and am about 6 beers in ATM so what’s your excuse?

Citation needed for “improper access to health care.” Start with a definition of what that actually means.

And nothing you’ve posted actually demonstrates it does not. A voluntary system where there is 85% uptake where employers provide benefits for 50%+ of citizens and a social safety net that covers all children, disabled, and elderly (assuming they worked 40 quarters in their adult life or was married to someone who…

I’ve been paid by the Federal Government, private contractors, corporations and individuals in the healthcare industry. They’re all hated in some respects.

So you’re just an ignorant ass-clown whose opinion is virtually meaningless?

War Eagle

Tens of millions are very happy with their healthcare in the USA. The CAHPS commercial, Adult Medicaid, and various 65+ Medicare surveys confirms this annually. Other industry surveys support these results. National averages of respondents who rate their health plan and health care as an 8, 9 or 10 on a 10 point scale…

It’s pretty simple. Pre-ACA the uninsured in the country hovered around 85% -

US system works well for 85% of people. 10% voluntarily sit out. 

...the unregistered ones would be the ones getting confiscated... 

But it’s not about revenue, value, or worth INSIDE the governing body. The men are paid more simply because their value outside the organization.

...free ads against the opposition?

Why 112 MPH is my question.

I care nothing of the results. I’m only frustrated but with the students and politicians who continue to use the flawed survey I like to tout universal support for the GND. That survey is complete junk for the current proposal considering the proposal did not exist when the poll was commissioned.

Liberal ideology and plans are super popular. Liberals... not so much.

There’s serious issues with using that poll as evidence of support of a green new deal, the first of which was that it was conducted months before this session of Congress. People “supporting” the NGD at the time had no idea was the proposal would be since it wouldn’t be released until much later. This is clearly…

Wow, hung up on that pedantry so much it is hilarious.