I did live through it, being thirty, and Home Improvement was far more popular, The Simpsons eventually outpaced Home Improvement as a cultural moment but it never compared in raw ratings and ad revenue during that time.

And?

Oh not at all, The Simpsons was never as popular as it seemed, and most kids I knew weren't even allowed to watch it. The show never had a season that broke the Top 10 for that very reason, we could only watch drivel like Home Improvement. Arguably its best stretch of ratings wasn't until the turn of the century after…

I recall the JTT fandom, it was that and N*SYNC here, explosive clitoral panty steam everywhere the eye could see, it seemed to be a major factor in the show's popularity.

In the year of Trump I think this is a pretty valuable insight, some people are just plain malicious, pure and simple.

Sadly no, if you look up "South Park is BACK!" and see their little anthem spoof they are firmly against both Colin and the people criticizing the police by way of strawman and then mocking them for needing the police, and then returning to their criticism after no longer needing them.

The show tanked, not sure why you opened with a seemingly positive reference to his ratings. He has such a poor historical perspective, though I lost any respect for his judgement when he implied Bernie Sanders was actually the same as Donald Trump, it was played as a clever skit but it had been beaten to death by…

The language is to the left of the party in 1996, the actions are not, Barney Frank for instance championed legislation that has created the four largest banks in human history, with no means or method of dissolving them safely, that's a far grander achievement than Bill's deregulation of Wall Street ever hoped to…

Her political history is directly contrary to her own platform and statements, and the polled beliefs of the voters, what people think they're voting for and what they're actually voting for seem more disconnected than ever before.

Her entire economic team is from Wall Street, she has the most aggressive military record of perhaps any Democrat in the party, she favors deep austerity including cuts to Social Security, she has fought a minimum wage hike for years - and ended a living wage in Haiti - including her meek support for $12 over six…

The problem is, social issues aside, she is not better, it's not a matter of "least-favorite democrat" it's a matter of I can find nothing to agree with, she has the most conservative platform of any Democratic nominee pre-Reagan.

We should be excited over someone seemingly no voters in the party actually agree with, solely because of that person's gender?

She's not at all, she's socially left leaning(as of 2014) and right wing on domestic and foreign issues, altogether that would be right leaning, which is to say why should the gender be of matter when the nominee so deeply opposes a party politically?

I'm not sure why we should be excited about the first female president when she's the most right wing Democrat nominated in over thirty years, it would be like if our first gay president were a Republican.

Heavens, why don't they just hire Bernice and Clark to do an ad?

Yikes, that DA is an awful character, first she rattles off some Tumblr spiel and then refuses to prosecute $700,000 in money laundering, but threatens to prosecute the guys who were robbed if they don't pay contractors?

I'm with Bob, I want a mouthful of Marshmallow

Bryan MuFucking Fuller

Jericho's existential crisis messed me up

I thought "Is he…he is, he's about to imitate a human gesture of comfort, this is really painful, it's like a robot trying to laugh at a joke."