I have to admit the constant attacks from both commentators and the editors themselves directed at the show purely for their own political beliefs is pretty discouraging.
I have to admit the constant attacks from both commentators and the editors themselves directed at the show purely for their own political beliefs is pretty discouraging.
"Best visual of the night: Eve using her Hexenbiest powers for no-handed push-ups."
"Jimmy Carter’s handling of the Iran Hostage Crisis"
Hey, it can only get better from here, right?
I thought the man in the mask was Earth 1's Zoom doppelganger though.
"That Cupid joke was Family Guy level, though."
Cartoons, where the impossible happens, in real life deep smooth voices repel women. Studies back it up, and also anecdotal evidence, now if you'll pardon me while I sob alone.
Literally two seconds, those locks are garbage, I speak as a fellow expert lockpick.
"That would have been a can of worms the show should never open."
"Eve’s reminder that Hitler was a wesen is a reference I’d prefer the show forgot, given its ties to one of the darker patches in Grimm history. Stupid magic coins."
Can she name the new dog Twoqueg? Quetwo?
Yeah, and there's always plenty of evidence, people just don't care.
I've always enjoyed the fact that my fellow fans embrace the show, but harshly reject conspiracies, of which many are continually uncovered as documents are declassified but they take no interest in, and who then attack Snowden for releasing documents about an actual conspiracy we knew about 7 years prior that no one…
Rambling repetition, repeating rebuffed requests for ridiculous evidence.
Your ilk said as much, it's guilt by association, and are we really stuck on puerile needs for explicit statements of intent? When our villains do wrong we simply know, but when someone with sketched eyebrows deigns call entire studios sexist over a butt we need affidavits of intent signed by the accused.
You would follow your own logic, it might do you well, your argument rests on the pedantics of semantics, of explicit admission. A litmus test you apply only to your own ideology, but by way of these comments any form of criticism lends grandiose imagery to MRA devilry, fedoras, and "mum's basement" merely through…
If critiquing feminism means you're committing misogyny, the lesser stretch is that calling for desexualizing the female body is censorship.
She has, I have no energy to invest in pedantic nitpicking over your ideology being so threatened by reality.
Thus, discourse submerges into the self imposed mire of inevitable pedantry.
Yes, aggressively de-sexualizing all media is censorship minded, it's a goal of what I would term fourth wave feminism.