wade8813--disqus
Wade8813
wade8813--disqus

Finally recognize? They've done this multiple times. She was outmatched that time Roy stitched her up, she was outmatched that time Ollie saved her, she was outmatched the first time she tried to fight anyone after Sara died, and there's probably a few others.

Isn't it a no murder policy, rather than no kill? Killing when someone is shooting at you is different than when you ambush them and they're unarmed and untrained

Was it just me, or did his mustache seem to grow in twice as fast as the rest of his facial hair? It looked weird to me

He doesn't really know Malcolm that well, but even if he did, I'm not sure that's a call you can make. To call that as a bluff? That's playing with fire

It's not about ego. It's about fear.

I will confess to having run that through Google translate.

I was thinking the same thing, although obviously if they were allowed to go that route, they could have done some things differently

I think some of the Spider-man love triangles (yes, plural) from the comics were handled fairly well

There seems to be a really obvious solution for that - sex in the shower

Kativer? Who's Kat?

My guess is that the Army is tying ARGUS' hands

It's a fantasy for some people.

He's probably even better off than that.

Is that actually what happened, or just speculation?

And maybe some life insurance (from each parent)

Pretty sure Ollie still has lots of money.

The trope exists and is a real problem. But it doesn't therefore mean that all writers should never kill women again.

Teaming up with someone who's really, really skilled when you're outgunned isn't entirely unreasonable.

Okay, so now people like Roy and dislike Oliver…?

I tend to buy into plot armor more than other people, but it has to be handled right.