If gender is social construct then it is defined by a society . Being defined by a society implies a majority opinion within that society . So your singular opinion isn’t worth much since you agree society is in charge of the definition..
If gender is social construct then it is defined by a society . Being defined by a society implies a majority opinion within that society . So your singular opinion isn’t worth much since you agree society is in charge of the definition..
Pople felt weird about their gender in other countries but I guarantee their gender was perceived to be the one they happened to identify with . This idea that cultures have a vastly different understanding of gender is a stretch . All cultures have more in common when it comes to how gender is defined .
For me it’s the fear in people believing in logically inconsistent concepts like gender binary or religion. Which opens the door to people believing in more logically inconsistent things . Non binary isn’t logically consistent as an idea and is problematic if you think about its implications. There’s absolutely no…
“Something that’s considered typically masculine in one place can be seen as typically feminine in another. Or during another time in history” this refers to gender roles not gender . Your gender wouldn’t change when you step into a culture with a different set of gender roles even if they think what you’d consider…
You don't know prince so wtf would you know who he'd side eye . "They're white and I would side eye them therefore prince would too" is what you're doing . Prince would probably definitely side eye you
Trans folk get hormone therapy.... you're ignoring gender neutral people, gender queer , non-binary. They just have to sit sports out right?
Little evidence≠ NO EVIDENCE. You guys keep missing that part . The sentence implies there is little evidence not no evidence that "transgender women ruin the sport"
Gender doesn't refer to biology so how can someone be biologically woman?
“there's little evidence" implying there's is evidence but not very much .....
It wouldn't be possible to divide by skillset, dumbass. THINK ABOUT IT FOR MORE THAN A MINUTE AND YOU MIGHT FIND OUT WHY
“I don’t care about prestige therefore you shouldn’t”
“amateurs and youth athletics are about participation not prowess" don't you understand that that is simply your opinion?
This is assuming every trans person wants to be on hormones.... DONT YOU GET THAT?????
WWhy would forcing trans women to suppress their naturally occurring hormones in order to compete with cis women be fair? It implies also that anyone who can't afford to transition can't compete . How is that fair?
We're talking about sports and you're saying winning doesn't matter? Winning is the point
The Bible doesn’t say what you says it does , or you would’ve shown where it says it . You’ve heard this about the old law and never bothered to look it up . But let’s assume the law only applied to jewish people of the past , how does that make it any better? God still have these laws to men . These laws come from…
would a citation change your opinon? i doubt it .
difference is all you had to do to be competitive was gain weight... what can females do when they face males competitively ? taken to its logical conclusion your position implies all sports should be coed , if you dont hink they should all be coed , why shouldnt they be?
this might surprise you but, most sports dont involve grappling....
lol you can believe trans people are valid in their identity and still think transwomen shouldnt compete with cis women ...isnt nuance weird?