waclark57
waclark57
waclark57

We get this in the town I live in. Traffic gets backed up waiting for the ferry boat to load and unload. People will sit right in the middle of an intersection even when there are lines painted in the intersection and big signs up and down the road that say “Do Not Block Intersections”.  And people will give you these

Better yet, open the doors and turn on the car headlights too. 

Well, to be fair, these days you never know what’s going to happen when you confront someone. Even when you’re in the right. People are wacko and given that someone drove up to a random person’s house and parked on their lawn and plugged in their Tesla I’d be very cautious about engaging them. They have exhibited

No way they can stop it. If a developer wants to offer a single license and you can download from either store, they can do that.

No way they can stop it. If a developer wants to offer a single license and you can download from either store, they

I ensure you the marketing department has already done the math. They sell X games at Y price. If they raise Y to Y+ it may have an impact on the number of games sold, but they still may make more money.

If your average salary is higher than game studios then you’re paying over $100K to “tech” employees and that doesn’t include benefits or facility costs. So, $10K/mo for a tech employee doesn’t seem far off at all. Maybe the estimates on number of people needed is off, but the monthly cost average seems pretty

But this is a good point. It’s not really 40 people over 2 years, it’s 50 man years, 25 jobs at any given time over 2 years, but those 25 positions are spread over 40 people.

2 questions.

According to GlassDoor an average Gaming Software Engineer makes about $103K/year. Add another 24% for over head and you’re pretty much at $10K/month.

A general rule of thumb is that an employee’s benefits can cost up to 1.25-1.5 their salary. So a developer, making $75K/year could be costing the company $93-112K. 

Money and wealth give you a lot more options that the rest of us. Michelle may have had a lot of say in what she wore, but she had designer choices that you and I will never have. And being First Lady doesn’t hurt either. 

Now you’re just showing your bias. Melania is a beautiful woman. I’m sorry you cannot accept that. 

This article seems so unscientific. First, how do any crash test dummies take into account pelvic shape or fat distribution? Second, I presume they are using taller, heavier, male dummies. Why wouldn’t those results apply to taller, heavier women as well?

Let’s talk about this no-show policy right quick,

Actually there is some other deal breaker for you because you don’t have a Switch, which can be plugged into a TV. So, for some reason you haven’t bought a Switch, even though it can plug in. Not that it’s my business but have you considered what that reason is? Maybe it’s cost or maybe you don’t play many Nintendo

I so agree with this post. This is 1984 Dad with a teenage daughter who has found an interest in boys. I ran into so many dads like this when I was young, this felt very real to me.

Actually it was Megan who stated that it was her sexuality that made the difference. Remember when she said you need gays to win? I noticed a lack of silence from the left regarding that bigoted, sexist comment.

Good call. I noticed that as well when I took a second look at the photo. Her outfit looks nearly identical to Megan’s, including the jewelry. 

Totally agree. Her look really isn’t that great, certainly not headline worthy. I’m sure the fashionistas will rip her apart. Leather shorts? And it’s not even original, look at the woman on the far right, she’s get nearly the same outfit as Megan, minus the leather.

Why? What logical reason is there to make a cash payment when you could use a traceable and convenient electronic method? I’m asking a legit question. I know why some people like cash transactions today, and frankly it’s wrong. Many of them want to avoid taxation with cash. What other reasons would a person have for