I would advise you to read the Order - if someone is arbitrarily denying entry to people holding valid visa’s... then they are not following the Executive Order
I would advise you to read the Order - if someone is arbitrarily denying entry to people holding valid visa’s... then they are not following the Executive Order
that article is flooded with misinformation
1) please read the actual Executive Order - as then you will understand that there is no “ban” only extra vetting (also there are no countries listed in the EO)
“WAR IS PEACE”
Obama is the only president to serve a full 2 terms whilst at war - wins Nobel Peace Prize - talks about destruction of Syria, after dropping 12,192 bombs on it.
if its “not a big deal” then why not release the 7 people currently in jail for the same crime?
if any of them have sent or received classified information that is an offence people are currently rotting in jail for.. and they should receive the same punishment... I love how the left media is fine with it when Hillary was caught - but suddenly its a bad thing ‘cos some Trump staffers are doing it!
sooo... same deal with the last 8 years of @barackObama?
In fairness... it was not Trump that got rid of these pages, it was the Obama administration that took them down as part of the transition
hello great ancestors, I come from a future ravaged by world wide war - although the war accelerated great triumphs in technology - it came at the expense of great numbers of casualties - the world population dropped to just under half a billion... but don’t worry, you wont have to go through such hardships. I came…
they just responded with an interview with an ex-MI5 intelligence officer - she said this could be using copyright as a pre-text for censorship - they just posted it on the RT youtube channel... interesting to get a viewpoint from MI5 Intelligence (I’m guessing after what they’ve seen they will probably go straight to…
again, just to be fair... you say they are going in with a purpose, but the few stories we see are usually just defence from allegations on the Russian government - this is a very very small part o what RT reports, much of their content has nothing to do with the US or Russia, and when they do have US based story they…
to be fair, yes, they are government funded like BBC - and yes, they are biased like CNN.. but! that doesn’t mean they are factually incorrect, I’ve seen much of their content and am yet to see anything factually incorrect - when you start banning press (like this.. or like when Trump snubbed CNN) its a slippery slope…
yes, RT was biased.. they should be unbiased! like cnn.. and msnbc... yes they should have that US propaganda agency... but the name is all wrong.. might I suggest “Ministry of Truth” ... has a nice edgy sound to it.