It might have been good, it might have been bad, the only important thing it had to do was bag enough money, and it didn't do that.

True, also I don't get the hate for World's End.

I guess there’s a misconception here. They shouldn’t call this a phone, they should call it a foldable tablet (that you can also use as a phone).

Movies needed to die movies ago.

Trying so hard.

I’d have to look into but I believe it is not entirely true.

“It does play into automation’s narrative of efficiency, but you’re essentially helping out overworked nurses at already understaffed hospitals.”

Good, she’s tired from fucking my father.

I can’t I’m tired from fucking your wife.

What your describing is much more of... a VR application... For the distant plumber. Create a full 3d camera or a drone with a laser pointer and you’ll achieve more or less the same at a lower price.

To be useful those things should be able to replace phone screens: they should be highly mobile, or in short they’d need to fit in the “Google Glass” form factor. Nobody’s going to run around with those things on their heads.

You should have tried Codename 47, when there wasn't any save at all. In a way it was kinda crazy but it was also crazy intense.

Or maybe take a furniture package, remove instructions, throw in a few extra screws and deliver it to your target. A lot worse than death.

And yet till recent day it was always profitable for a ruler (whether political or industrial) to have more subjects.

At some point we should consider the automation endgame.

Reality finally catches up with fiction:

Well it’s a design choice.

I’d say it a feature.

Well, let’s just say it happens that way.

This might be actually quite acurate: