No, that’s not fair because “stand in the way of unionizing” is illegal.

In fact the line is so thin that you should avoid the subject all together.

Stuntpeople are trained to do that sort of thing, they’d be able to assess the risks and react much better. Thurman has released the video of her crash and it is easy to find.

Just like for the Landis incident: give stunt coordinators more responsibilities and more power. Make it mandatory for them to review and sign off any stunt and make them personally responsible so they won’t bow at any director’s whim.

Terrible photoshop often end in “professional” pictures like magazine cover, catalogs... It’s not much of a stretch it could appear on instagram...

So there’s a mystery third party involved but FBI would get involved only after the case makes to mainstream press? If anyone assumes some organized interest is involved, that sounds like a really dumb strategy from Tesla...

On the contrary, it all sounds very amateurish and make little sense. Why would Tesla sue? Deterrence and PR... “Best” case scenario is “the conspiracy” is using a disgruntled employee, but that guy sounds clearly out of control.

Well patents and trade secret are more or less the same thing for the issue at hand: being defensive about you’re intellectual property. You can’t pretend you’re “open” because you give away your patents while you actually keep the useful stuff secret.

That guy sounds a little crazy (based on Tesla claims), I’m pretty sure it’s the press or something like that.

As far as I understand it it is all Tesla internal investigations and claims, I’d wait for independent investigation.

If Germany hadn’t invaded Russia, chances are they would have ultimately succeeded in invading Britain, except chances are USSR would have launched an offensive at some point... And then all the bets are off, or not. Rewriting history is a mostly futile exercise.

the Allies blew most of it up to avoid it being used against them.

The difference is Twilight brought truckloads of money.

Blade “I” has more features. Like it looks better on paper. But overall it is a much inferior movie. Blade II is simply much better made. Any Blade II secondary character is more defined than Blade’s main ones.

It mostly benefits from a GdT.

SU, Blade II should actually be lauded for giving him an opening for larger roles in Hollywood.

Well he technically isn’t really a villain.

I have the opposite experience: ratings are often too generous.

It’s all in shades and in the end it’s all a tradeoff. You compare pros and cons. For lvl2-3, we’ve discussed the cons, as for pros they are limited because you have constantly to be able to retake control, it’s basically minor comfort improvement. So that makes it a no go.

Actually there is no reason to believe that you need to sell lvl1-3 vehicles to make lvl4+ ones. I mean testing them in prototypes, probably, but you don’t need to commercialize them. Many manufacturers claim they’ll be able to deliver lvl4+ from start.