vw-miles-equal-dog-years
VW miles = dog years
vw-miles-equal-dog-years

One of the videos said it was Roosevelt Boulevard, which is even more dangerous. However, once you get to I-76/Roosevelt Boulevard levels of danger, it ceases to matter.

Is it permanently parked somewhere? If not, I’m impressed. 80's VW’s could go the distance, however.

I second that: It didn’t take long for me to transition from “see Spot run” to Car and Driver in the 90's. Even then I was well aware of who Brock Yates was. My dad also had a subscription to Road & Track, but even now I recall it seeming very clinical compared to Car and Driver at the time, which was in no small

Descending order of universal sympathy:

We need a Fit Type-R.

Needs wider cockpit.

This is simply reporting the facts, in this case the fact that Tesla/Musk made the above claim. Now who should be liable for any harm the claim causes: the company that makes the product and made the claim, or someone reporting on the fact that the statement was made?

No trip to New York is complete without grabbing a can or two out of that beer trough for the train ride home.

Fast? Yes, but still a Neon.

Unimpressed without seeing the bathroom.

If you’re defending BMW’s name scheme, maybe you should give up on cars (and instead devote your free time to learning how to detect sarcasm on the internet).

This brings back childhood memories of ghost riding crappy old bicycles down hills and off jumps. It never gets old.

Yeah, but that was long ago, a time when my cell phone could only call and marginally text people, and had none of that interweb stuff. It was a simpler time. In the advanced state of current society, with our huge science-pad phones, clearly we need 40 different alphanumeric names within a model lineup to

I’m sure everyone getting an MA in philosophy is thinking “MY TIME HAS FINALLY COME.”

You do realize that the end-game of autonomy is for there to be no “driver” at all, right? And if/when that day comes, I will be getting driven around by an autonomous car while drunk, which is of absolutely no consequence.

Predictions like this are either good faith naïveté from Silicon Valley tech execs or a bad faith efforts to inflate stock prices. 

I’m pretty sure there’s a name for this, that is, the dilution of the perceived urgency of warning the more frequent they are.

It still bothers me that the X5 and the Cayenne have to exist, but I understand that selling an SUV in the American market is pretty much like printing money. If they have exist, might as well make them powerful as hell.

Upsides of military paternalism: free healthcare, clear paths to advancement.

Then you should feel some guilt for being a judgmental asshole. I’m also willing to bet you haven’t had to ponder morality on a scale coming anywhere close to that of the OP (‘choosing not to join the military’ is not a valid response, I’m talking about real, affirmative decision-making).