Blaming a symptom not a cause. People aren’t making a lot of money and you can’t blame folks for making logical consumption choices with limited resources.

You are against them complaining about not making enough. So you are playing semantic games where you aren’t explicitly saying you are against them making more, just saying they’re not justified in complaining.

Which is dumb. You have a different situation than they. You are getting by fine with your amount of pay. …

I come from a rural area. I’ve lived on significantly less than what you say you make.

I’m not mocking you because “we don’t matter”, I’m mocking you because you’re arguing against other people making a good wage when you don’t either.

“I survived” what a ringing endorsement.

Yes, most everyone in this conversation has lived on a small amount at some point. That doesn’t make it not a problem.

I love it that whenever HamNo posts common sense he gets the Financial Pedantry brigade to explain how endowments are completely meaningless and can’t be spent on anything and somehow Harvard isn’t unbelievably wealthy as an institution.

You’re playing a semantic game to try and make yourself feel smart, not because it…

“I’m with Hellary”

NFL teams are generally not net positives for local economies. So they’re taking a potential revenue stream to fund education and health services, diverting it to a private interest, and gaining next to nothing other than making rich people richer.

Great move!

Yes I can’t imagine how drawing attention to their enormous wealth, at a time when they are refusing to pay low-wage workers well, would be relevant.

I mean, they can barely afford to keep the lights up there.

cebisexual

What a loss you will be to the liberal cause.

“I can’t shit on the people who literally shove food into my lazy mouth? Heck no I’m out!”

You deserve these comments for posting something that dumb.

Man, if you didn’t keep posting such dumb shit the odds of people disagreeing with you would be lower.

That’s why i said close camera shots. All of the floppy wieners are group shots or distance. The only up-close shots are breasts. Up close naked males are positioned to avoid genitals.

While the show clearly is trying to explore the nature of humanity, sentience, and reality, one has to acknowledge that the show has some lasciviousness to it’s aspects.

It’s still a traditionally male fantasy(western), and the show is still shot with male gaze(90% of the close camera shots on nudity are women).

I’d…

Only one example so far. I will not say how bad it is because it depends on the person:

Woman is dragged off to a presumed rape.

There are, ostensibly...at least assuming the people running the world are humans.

lol

LOL this is incredible.

but if you’re not reading them.....lol.....

Yep, this is easy