So, they chose convenience and appealing to the core audience. Same for Ghost in the Shell.

michelle obama sure seemed to think the position had responsibilities, and i, for one, thank her for her herculean efforts.

In other news, water is wet.

I too trust my telemarketer to fix my teeth

Personal limitations.

The companies need to be shamed and harassed. The more the better.

As a company I say harass the hell out of EA, why not? Just not the individuals.

Battlefront II: Nothing egregiously wrong on any one platform. Frostbite is DICE’s baby, so they know how to tune it anywhere. (And will apparently let Visceral and Bioware twist in the wind, but that’s another story.) Nobody’s paid for any platform exclusives, or perhaps Disney has a “no Console War bullshit” clause…

That’s certainly not the intention. Hopefully people come away from a silly comparison like this feeling less enraged. Harassment is bad and never an appropriate way to express frustration or anger over something.

And the fact that post launch support did not need loot box revenue in 1198,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015 and the better part of 2016.

I get you’re trying to keep people from “armchair developing”, but I think you might be missing the overall criticism of the game. You’re essentially asking “what would you have to give up to get rid of loot boxes” when loot boxes are inherently something that’s added on top of a game and most would agree that the…

Please apply that to the problems prevalent in this game. Namely monetization systems that choose to abuse the player and the audience.

I could tell you just one reason this game could have not had backlash.

EA, is that you?

I don’t like your opinion.

It is impossible because humans evolved to eat meat. We’re going to.

I think it’s that you can either pay to unlock the content, or unlocking the content is super laborious, for a $60 game. They are making the content hard to unlock for free, trying to force users to pay to unlock it.

Dumb article that only exists for a click, which in turn references a dumb essay that itself only exists for a click.

“Hey guys, some people used this art/historical moment/idea for racist/sexist/etc. purposes, and it is wrong wrong wrong to reference the art/historical moment/idea without referencing (read:…

Aaaaand it’ll still sell a billion copies and nothing will change. Because in 2017, after almost a decade now of gamers “complaining” about DLC and pay to win shit, the vast majority of them still buy the games anyway, teaching these companies nothing. Yes, there will be exceptions (which I’m sure people who respond…