that you’re ignorant.

Ms. Cleo has resorted to semantics because it has no argument.

so, to be clear, you say district judges and ambassadors are “appointed,” but are still subject to senatorial approval; scotus justices are “nominated” but are still subject to senatorial approval.

that thing you keep whining about. what’s it called? consti-.... consti...?

no, i wouldn’t characterize your ignorance as ironic, my dear.

still waiting for you to enlighten us as to the vast differences between “appointment” and “nomination.” both are subject to senatorial confirmation.

well, what am i left with when your argument is so inherently moronic?

dear, i’m right regardless of what direction your idiocy takes.

you don’t even know what you’re arguing for anymore. back under the bridge, troll.

Words have meaning, and I’m sorry that is hard for you. FYI, the president only “appoints” district court judges.

log off, take a dump, get laid. ideally in that order. you’ll feel better.

that flew right over you tiny little head, didn’t it? adorable.

nominate/appoint — don’t get so constipated over semantics bruh. try miralax.

nope. they just reelected the dude who appoints supreme court justices.

someone needs scholarship money for read school.

so, just checking, were your parents *aware* they were brother and sister or was it an unresolved luke-and-leia kind of situation?

2012 general election. look it up, bucket o’ afterbirth.

Elections have consequences.

if the dumb hick shoe fits.

“Great citation!” – Super virgin proverb.