They heard “Chad” and assumed someone was talking about them.

“Hopefully, a few copies of her forthcoming book will be distributed among the current occupants of the White House.”

“why sell it for a million to the cia, when TMZ will pay 10mil?”

I’m sure he understands it all. He’s just dissembling for the administration.

Unfortunately, they are that but also much more - when you consider their lobbying power and the fact that they own the Republican party, and also, when you see the rhetoric they push via their NRATV videos, you’ll see that they’re also clearly fomenting civil war - granted in an effort to continue to increase gun and…

They don’t and never have represented gun owners. That’s the lie they tell gun owners to keep their donations flowing. They represent gun manufacturers, therefore their only goal is to increase gun sales. They have no place in this discussion, as they are inherently biased.

*gasps* Nooooo... It’s because we aren’t disciplining our kids enough and just letting the crazies run wild. You don’t understand anything about guns. AR-15s are no more dangerous than other guns.

You’re right, so let’s regulate guns like we do cars. You have to be trained and licensed to operate one, the ownership of each of them are registered with the state and all private transfers have to be done with filing paperwork with the government registry, liability insurance must be carried whenever operating one,…

The simplicity is so beautiful.

This is such a dumb argument. Cars actually have a (debatable) social utility. They allow people to move stuff, travel, take the kids to hockey practice. There’s (debatably) more good that comes with the bad.

She’s kind of right: the NRA do not need “to come to the table.” In fact, they don’t need a place at the table at all, ever again. The gun industry shouldn’t get a say in gun control.

Also proven effective in preventing mass shootings: stricter gun laws. Let’s go with that one first, then address the media.

Again, this is not disastrous in any way shape or form. Its ‘teaching the controversy’ straight out of the creationist playbook. This is very effective propaganda and cnn and all tv ‘news’ does the empirically based community (i.e. reality) a significant disservice by even having this person on. Ppl who are obviously…

In fact, Loesch added a short while later, it’s the TV stations themselves who are partially to blame for mass shooters.

There’s a horrible meme going around Facebook that blames mass shootings on the fact that we don’t discipline our children enough. Or that the problem was only within the last 30 years. This has been going on since forever, however as the Washington Post has said that before the UT Austin tower shooting in 1966, there…

The day Dana Loesch announces in advance that she’s going to appear in an open public place at a specific time, without any kind of security or protection, and tell how it’s all the fault of everyone else except the NRA that kids are getting gunned down and follows through on her plans, then I’ll be impressed.

Your head may hurt, but somewhere else a conservative just read your sentence there and thought to themselves, “Yup. Yeah... that makes sense! It’s the darned librul media to blame for this shooting, not the nationwide organization that’s ABOUT shooting! duh!”

Is her argument “You love seeing kids murdered! We’re just helping kids get killed to boost your ratings!”?

It’s pretty well established that conservative causes choose their female spokespersons by criteria that don’t require them to be personable. They want girls who are as combative as they are fuckable—and they better be very combative.

Think about this for a second. Dana Loesch is NRA spokesperson because she was THE MOST PERSONABLE INDIVIDUAL THEY COULD FIND TO DEFEND THEIR BULLSHIT.