While I do agree, Singapore’s reasoning is a bit flawed, calm down a bit, please.
I can only hope that this results in a Trump response and a vigorous back and forth between the two. Inevitably Trump will call him a loser and a failure which will only give Olbermann another chance to unload on him. Please let this happen!!!
exactly, this is horrible, this idea.
I’m willing to go with the coffee or chocolate (hey, they put chocolate in mole, right), but I think cinnamon in chili is an abomination. And I like cinnamon. In ice cream. On apples. In chewing gum. But not in chili. Used to be a place around DC called Hard Times that, among other nastiness, used to serve a…
I don’t know, this sounds too close to Cincinnati-style chili. I had that exactly once, enough to know that I shall stay away from it.
That’s more than I thought she would be awarded, but I’m happy to be wrong about that. Fuck that pervert and fuck Marriott.
+100,000,000 Marriott Rewards points
I know that they will probably appeal, and maybe get the settlement knocked down some, but good for her. It is absolute bullshit that this guy was able to not only get her information, but get booked next to her.
Tom. Just to clarify the headline, Marriot is not held liable, its the local owner. And they were only found 49% liable, so they are on the hook for $26M. The guy who recorded it is responsible for $28M, but I imagine that will never get paid due to bankruptcy and lack of funds.
Did they break down how they arrived at $55M?
Holy shit. Good for her!!
Ha! Dude wanted a Trout souvenir, but only came away with a red herring.
As an owner of one of these vehicles I would love to see VW propose an actual solution and implementation timeline soon. If it has to come at the hands of a judge, so be it. I’m kind of getting pissed at being left in limbo on the issue for 6 months with VW thinking they have many more months to work out their optimum…
Full House was always corny. Fuller House is the same corniness with jokes appropriate for modern time.
Lavabit wasn’t ordered to turn over its source code. Lavabit was ordered to turn over its SSL private keys. In this case, Apple doesn’t have the key (which is why we’re in this mess to begin with), so the FBI is ordering them to create a tool that would make it easier for the FBI to find a key that works. Turning over…
Copyright would be irrelevant in the face of a court order. (Technically, all written records are under copyright, that doesn’t protect them from court orders)
That is a very interesting thought. Not sure they could compel Apple to give its Source Code though as I am sure that is protected through Copyright or something like that.
Say the order gets rejected and apple wins because the courts say you can’t compel apple to create this backdoor tool. So what happens when the FBI then says, ok give us the iOS source code and we’ll create the backdoor without your help. Isn’t that what lavabit had to do?