Oh yeah, he even recognized the game - he's been a sports nut for years - the thought of anyone showing that game in a 2015 "Man Zone" room almost gave him a stroke from laughing so hard.
Oh yeah, he even recognized the game - he's been a sports nut for years - the thought of anyone showing that game in a 2015 "Man Zone" room almost gave him a stroke from laughing so hard.
We were watching this at my parent's house and my dad lost his mind when he saw those USFL clips. He immediately started laughing harder than I've ever seen him laugh in my entire life.
I almost cried when Nathan said "I think everyone should be able to do everything" and the gun nut guy looked like he just received a fart-delivered challenge.
Except sometimes it's true. Like when someone is so depressed that internet comments that they perceive as negative towards them ends in suicide. I'd say being concerned about mental health care is absolutely the right response in that particular case.
Something something baby with the bathwater.
No worries. Subjective topics are subjective and the internet has no tone.
I agree, people should attempt to be decent human beings.
That's all based on your personal perception of what constitutes "bullying" and proper human interactions/ideas. You don't get to decide that for the rest of us.
I think the anon nature of the internet doesn't facilitate debates in the traditional sense and it is always going to be exploited by bored people. Proud trolls using naughty words, sneaky trolls trying to derail, sophisticated trolls that are only trolling some of the time. It's the nature of the beast.
I took it as a callback to how our repressed societies have dealt with what they considered heterics in the past. Public hangings/burnings to make sure everyone knows what happens to those who try to speak truth in a vacuum.
I think it was telling that the plus-sized models were all attractive by South Park standards. If they really wanted to shame, they'd have given them disgusting bodies.
Since there's no tone on the internet, I don't know if this is supposed to be a passive-aggressive jab at me, but please know I'm not sensitive at all.
We'll agree to disagree. I feel one way, you feel a different way.
Who am I (or you) to judge if someone is not acting in good faith or their ideas being spread around are actively harmful to something?
That's in the eye of the beholder. If you think it's cruel, ignore the person. If I said "I think the world is round" and someone replied "Well, I think your face looks like a sausage", I wouldn't stop laughing for a week.
I heard he doesn't donate to starving kids or hamsters either.
*shame, shame, shame*
Hyperbole, sure, but because a couple trolls use words you don't like, it means that you should insulate yourself from the rest of the world in a "safe space"? Do you, friend, just don't ask me to do the same. I value the exchange of ideas too much to isolate myself away in a vacuum.
Sure. If you want to live in a vacuum where the only ideas that get through are the ones you've already decided to believe and all dissenting voices are blocked out.
Yeah. I don't understand what you're point is at all then. Have a nice day.
If you can always block people on the internet and have control, why are we even talking about "safe spaces" then?