Okay there is one solid argument against this;
Okay there is one solid argument against this;
She's not even a blood relative I don't think. As hilarious a characature as I find her, I dont think it was her cause why would they not just shop her in no one attached to her đ¤Ł
Honestly my first thought was that it was probably the actual Queen but I also donât get if it bothered her that much why, again, she didnât stop the wedding.
You say youâre a republican.... Yet your defensive and pro-royal toned comments over the last week.... Tell a very different tale.
Na, it wont have been Charles. If he was worried about that he probably would have found a way to prevent the wedding entirely - he does seem smart enough to have clocked that issue before it arose đ
Please note that Mortal Dictatas analysis is very pro-monarchy and quite probably very English.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
I donât think itâs that Iâm not a person with sensory issues so much as me and you have had very different interactions with tights. The way you describe them reminds me of my interactions with real wool and dry wetsuits.
Yeah theyâre basically any layer that allows you to have your legs out without having your legs out. They're one of my favourite garments both for warmth and cause my legs look fantastic in black 40ish denier tights (well, they did 5-10 years ago. Now it's just better than they do without them hah)
I cry at literally anything. Including if Iâm really angry which makes yelling at people hard.
Omg I only learnt about Princess Michael of Kent and I sort of love it so much.
what the fuck really?
Sorry people mocking the Royal Family and other posh twats for batshit insane âtraditionsâ actually is a âBritishâ pasttime and I really think you need to take that Royalist stick out your arse.
Iâve literally never found tights to be itchy. I really enjoy this American phenomenon where tights are a big deal/torture that were inflicted on small children hahah.
Itâs not relevant to anything but âBritish tightsâ are any layer of material thatâs tight to your legs and envelopes your feet.
No tights is any kind of thin-ish material with both legs attached, enclosed feet and a smoothish top.
I havenât read this whole article properly (because itâs a little boring tbh) but Iâm sorry what?
Are you the actual Queen?
We had an email go round a couple of years ago saying we werent allowed to send emails outside of work hours (8-5 Monday-Friday).
Except imagine youâre dyed in the wool royal loving palace staff.