@mruler360: I don't know how these guys could have anything to do with the article, honestly.

@Arken: Agreed. Exactly what I had in mind when I saw the article title.

@Rosa Golijan: It's amazing and I hadn't seen it, nonetheless.

@shhhGoToSleep: Funny comment considering the comment above you.

@lazaruspryor: You look absolutely misplaced there.

@JAlexoid: The guy was just kidding around, no need for racist remarks.

@The Squalor and the Fury: What, I'm not enough?

@wyst: Really? Wow, that's creepy.

@EvanSei badass M.D. wants to be a photographer: I'm assuming you are not a musician.

@CSX321: Maybe that's because they really are big.

@Wookielifeday: Well, we are twice as young, from a comparative point of view.

@peggysuewho: Well, man who do the similar are called man whores, so I can't see how it isn't applicable. The right approach here is shoving the negative meaning off of "slut".

What a half-cooked idea.

"I think this imrpovement"

"I think this imrpovement"

That's just beautiful.

@Robert Anhalt: You were indeed right about them being sister sites, sorry — I had understood something completely different. Still, they have to source where they saw the image, not which website actually produced it. This last one is optional.

Well, not to say I don't like it, but it's too distractive.

@ernie.: First foreign language, actually.

@negitoro: I'm sorry, but English was the easiest language I ever learned. Also the first foreign language I learned.