The last automotive event I did, I ended up with 1600 RAW shots.

Typical internet commentator nonsense.

These colours are expensive to paint. Usually 3-5 layers and they generally source the colours from one off runs and special materials just to get the look.

It was "unreliable" because he placed a nonsense security system on it that always went off and was useless.

The Ford GT itself is probably the poster child for most reliable supercar on the planet.

This is the safe play to just make money till they figure out what will really give their brand a boost.

I don't have to like it, but I understand why.

I went for the less subtle route and basically called him a jackass.

None of them hit 100k miles because the Ford GT, unlike the NSX, went up and continues to go up in value.

Though I do know of a local car that has some serious mileage and is STILL worth 200k.

The GT is a different beast.

I'm sorry you had to go through that stupidity by that man.

"We are proud to introduce the 2009 Acura NSX at the 2015 Detroit Auto Show on the same day that Ford released the far more interesting GT because who really gives a shit about the 2009 NSX when the 2016 Ford GT is also here?"

I imagined a bald eagle shedding a tear over how much "MERICAAAAA FUCK YEA" this car has.

Something old, antiquated and useless for what Ford wants this car to do, you mean?

How exactly does one shit a dick?

I agree, advancement can happen in areas beyond just "go fast" but on a supercar, the mileage takes a backseat to performance otherwise you're not making a supercar anymore.

Because armchair racers want to feel "connected" to their car and all that other nonsense.

GTE homologation. A TT Voodoo is a no go.

good victory sir.

Yea, cause you were buying one if it had one. Right?

Who the fuck bought and drove a FGT because of fuel economy? Seriously?

Ford, to the rest of the supercar industry: FUCK YOU, IM THE BEST.

buy it Doug.