I'm going to have to second this motion, they staged the Tesla debacle. Every Jalop knows that...

Com' on man! Farris Bueller? In the movie it's supposed to be a Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder, but they actually used a "modena Spyder California" badged up as a Ferrari

Here we go again... non-story, so basically we don't know anything but let's play jump to conclusion...

This entire issue is embarrassing, how can anyone who is trying to limit Tesla sales even look in the mirror in the morning. There is no masking what this really is. I can't even wrap my mind around this.

You're Not Gonna Fall For The Banana In The Tailpipe?

200mph... hmmm, I'm thinking a GT2 996 with some upgrades might do it for around $70k Any other ideas?

sad

You have no clue what I do, and do not understand fool. What a stupid comment. Your prior comment was only one profitable model, weeeelll as a company who only produced one car they where profitable by 2009. And by your own admission the model S was profitable therefore... 2 profitable models. Where the revenue came…

http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/07/tec… They made and sold all 2400 and where profitable by 2009, now they have sold over 25,ooo of there 2nd model. I'd say at least 2 chickens can be counted...

2 But who's counting

Your wrong colonel sanders! Tesla, was doomed for failure, as for told by 9 out of 10 Jalopers.

Wouldn't a Tundra be a more suitable Raptor fighter?

I stared your comment, but was intrigued by the poo flinging comment. Maybe it was just a poor example. I was unsure if you meant us Mericans are hard to pick a fight with and it would take someone throwing poo at them, or limeys are so quick to the punch it makes it seem that way. Not sure which way you were going…

I know pshh, I mean a blog about cars pointing out a web series about comedians driving rare cars, hosted by a well known car guy. The unmitigated gall, Jalopnik. (thick sarcasm implied)

Me neither, because I'm an American.

The very definition of "using a car as a base" negates your point. For example z350 = g35, more seats, smoother ride, more "lux" less go.

For the last time, the GTR is not a luxury car. And no one buys a car that can go 0-60 in 2.9, then worries about the smoothness of the ride, no one.

Yes I have. The GTR is not a luxury car. Don't buy a car built for speed and expect a "cloud" ride. Don't buy a "cloud" ride care and expect it to take corners well. My joke was simply pointing out the irony of your comment. Fast car, rides rough, yes please.

ahhh, :( is the fast car too rough on your tooshie? My grandma says the same thing.