vertigo707
Vertigo
vertigo707

The funnest thing in your post is your lame attempt at being funny amounted to no more than a sad school yard ad hominem. Sad.

"I know, I'm going to make an awesome app to change the way people use Facebook. Uhm, since Apple has 13% of the market and Android has 81%... I think I'll choose Apple. You know, since I want the most amount of people to use it and all"

sad

You have no clue what I do, and do not understand fool. What a stupid comment. Your prior comment was only one profitable model, weeeelll as a company who only produced one car they where profitable by 2009. And by your own admission the model S was profitable therefore... 2 profitable models. Where the revenue came

http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/07/tec… They made and sold all 2400 and where profitable by 2009, now they have sold over 25,ooo of there 2nd model. I'd say at least 2 chickens can be counted...

2 But who's counting

Your wrong colonel sanders! Tesla, was doomed for failure, as for told by 9 out of 10 Jalopers.

Wouldn't a Tundra be a more suitable Raptor fighter?

I stared your comment, but was intrigued by the poo flinging comment. Maybe it was just a poor example. I was unsure if you meant us Mericans are hard to pick a fight with and it would take someone throwing poo at them, or limeys are so quick to the punch it makes it seem that way. Not sure which way you were going

My sincerest apologies I did indeed miss interpenetrate that. I was sure you where the prototypical "comment naysayer" but instead I was the "quick to judge defensive guy". Hat tip to you, and one less red bull for me.

That was the first thing I thought, I was trying to understand why the change there. I dug this up... "there had been some issues with the analysis of the performance of tires in the space environment and this eliminates one of the tires – with the other two tires easier to control than the nose wheel if there’s a

Ya, it's not really promoted as much but is more consistent with snow. The Drive from the valley is awesome too.

I never said it was, classic "putting words in my mouth".

Snowbowl, has always been a lack luster ski hill due to low snow pack levels. Acting like it's a recent development "last few years" is stretching it. I've been boarding in
AZ for 15 years (man I'm getting old) and it's always been hit or miss. I like "sunrise AZ" better for AZ snowboarding. Using reclaimed water for

I know pshh, I mean a blog about cars pointing out a web series about comedians driving rare cars, hosted by a well known car guy. The unmitigated gall, Jalopnik. (thick sarcasm implied)

Me neither, because I'm an American.

The very definition of "using a car as a base" negates your point. For example z350 = g35, more seats, smoother ride, more "lux" less go.

For the last time, the GTR is not a luxury car. And no one buys a car that can go 0-60 in 2.9, then worries about the smoothness of the ride, no one.

Yes I have. The GTR is not a luxury car. Don't buy a car built for speed and expect a "cloud" ride. Don't buy a "cloud" ride care and expect it to take corners well. My joke was simply pointing out the irony of your comment. Fast car, rides rough, yes please.