Also Martha really is self-made. She may have tons of assistants but it’s not because she couldn’t do things herself. All the crafts and hosting stuff? She’s been doing that always.She actually got a partial scholarship and worked her way through college with those skills and modelling. Then, she worked in finance,…

If Roman Polanski sets foot in the United States, he might come a lot closer to a far more intimate space with Mr. Weinstein than either desires.

🙇🏽‍♀️❤️

I don’t remember all the details, but there was something about how Martha was supposed to fire Cheeto Mussolini on air as a gag to launch her series but of course Trump absolutely refused and then behaved like a goddamn child about it and was a big baby about promoting Martha’s show and then when it got canceled…

I just have to jump in because I’m in Florida on a vacation I’ve been saving for for 6 months and I’m so bummed cuz the weather has suuuucked. I’m used to the cold but like...I paid a lot of money and used all my vacation time to come here expecting 75 degree weather (because that’s the freaking average!) and it was…

Sure, Jan.

“He’s not worthy of that kind of serious dialogue. He should be grateful I even bothered trolling him.”

Roman Polanksi expressed disappointment that he didn’t get to hang with Harvey Weinstein over the holidays.

That’s a pretty sad way to try to win an argument.

Right. It sort of sounds as if he intended it to be cathartic for her, but she actually found it re-traumatizing. That doesn’t make either one of them the bad guy. It’s certainly possible that he refused to listen to and empathize her at the time. It is also possible that she wasn’t able to speak up about it (the…

What a load of crap you’re spewing.

I’m relating it back to the assertion that he wrote that scene just for her knowing that it was essentially referencing what Harvey Weinstein did, and that Rodriguez was being deeply inconsiderate of what she had gone through. He makes it sound like it was supposed to be a sort of power fantasy, not exactly something…

I’m still not seeing what you’re getting at. The director is wrong for being inspired to create an empowered female character who gets to straight up murder people who victimized her? How was he recreating the trauma? Is there a rape scene in the movie? Also how does that work when he is literally telling her why he’s…

“She told me the horrifying story of what Harvey did to her seven years earlier...I then revealed to Rose right then and there that I was about to start writing a movie...I would write her a BAD ASS character and make her one of the leads.”

Where does he admit that he wrote that specific scene for her? The closest I could fine is this, “...I will never forget sitting with Rose at that party and instantly getting inspired to create a bad ass female action heroine who loses her leg and transforms into a superhero that rights wrongs, battles adversity, mows…

Vanity Fair should have fact checked/got Rodriguez side of events. Also, checked when the Weinstein’s started funding the film. You need both sides of the story and the facts.

Damn that is one insanely cruel article. They didn’t have to admit Weinstein assaulted him, but why the fuck did they switch their roles completely??

The Times retelling doesn’t even make sense. It’s so obvious important details are being left out.

Yeah, that’s not even spin, it’s outright lying.

The differences between the two retellings is... telling.