There’s no reason not to buy one? Alright. Tell you what. I’ll buy one of the headsets. You buy me a phone that it’s compatible with. How’s that sound, Gizmodo?

> Yes, they are intending to develop a network that caters to gaming - HOWEVER... The current network in place does the very same thing while catering to streaming and other large quantity data transfer that isn't very time sensitive.

> Netflix gets 5 mbps, but our own video service gets the full 50 mbps.

Unless they open it up for everyone then it can definitely be seen as traffic shaping.

The only way it would not violate (1) and (2) would be if Riot allowed their network to be used for all content. It's a network designed for ultra low latency specifically for LoL. Do you think Riot would spend so much of its own cash to open the network to everyone? No. That's traffic shaping.

And as I've said elsewhere, this would be impossible with full implementation of Net Neutrality protocols.

It kind of looks like these were taken with an IR filter.

Here's a question for the author. So what? How does this impact you or any of your readership?

Sony definitely took full advantage of the Streisand effect.

Kosh was okay. Who was that prick who came after him?

Unfortunately this kind of thing really isn't all that uncommon. Not only is "news" organizations more than happy to run with a story like this, they will often misinterpret or exaggerate the findings themselves. It's one of the many reasons why popular science and actual science differ so dramatically.

If it's Trigun with mecha then shouldn't you should reference something like Gun x Sword?

Is it just me or is the lawsuit about the fact that Apple forced a sub-par fabrication technology that couldn't actually keep up with demand rather than the fact that Apple didn't purchase the material?

Can't unsee...

But they were sure to make their political jabs over and over again.

I'd say the authors should refrain from making political commentary and stick to what they know, but I am starting to wonder if Gizmodo authors even have all that much tech knowledge anymore. The site's become little more than a "we love government" propaganda site.

Well, there is something called a gravity wave, at least in theory. The idea in general though is that no information can be transferred faster than the speed of light, so that includes the impact of gravity. I would need another 5 years of mathematics and 10 years of physics to really give a better discussion than…

No problem! Just take this future and Water World, put them together, and you'll have two bad movies that make one normal future.

It COULD, but until we know more about the other conditions on the planet, it's difficult to say. With the right compounds, especially enough water, simple life could form in the atmosphere. But I wouldn't hold your breath.

No, but those whose skeletons could adapt more easily would have done a better job at reproducing.