vantasselhoff
NotALLMenses
vantasselhoff

I mean, that he is changing/backing out of?

What have they actually agreed on though?

Repubs are not afraid of her, they hate her and that’s that. She won’t get anything done. She’s proud of being hated. She’s proud of comprimising like Obama to the point of accomplishing virtually nothing. She will be polarizing and powerless and she won’t care when she’s cashing Wall Street’s cheques.

That is actually what Congress would tell her. An uncooperative Congress renders a president useless, as evidenced by the past 7 years.

Are Bernie Bros even a thing?

The counts aren’t all in though - he has not lost! He tied!

She used to be a lawyer, she knows her way around some loop holes.

Clearly no debate about the debates is worse. Poor Clinton, so put out for having to acknowledge the candidate previously ignored by the DNC.

This is pretty significant. I can see why she would be afraid to embarrass herself here.

Oh I see now what you are saying. Bernie has been asking for more debates since the beginning of his campaign though. Hillary saw a slump in her polling and is now agreeing. I don’t see the problem in Sanders refusing to help her on her terms. In this way, yes it is strategic on his part, but not shifty. If anything,

Oh I see and yes I agree with you too. I think she is spinning this because she is exceptionally media savvy and kind of a bully, too.

I have been forced to watch them all after the fact because I work weekends and nights. Do you really think most of America cares so deeply about the debates that they would go after the fact and watch them online instead of just taking the headlines/pundits/edited clips for 100% gospel truth? Cause they don’t.

I can see that you are biased toward Clinton because you expound on Clinton’s complaints, but not on Sanders’. For instance, what is Sanders referring to when he says Clinton is mischaracterizing his requests? Could it be possible that she is spinning this? Could you maybe pretend to be unbiased and thorough?

Also, Bernie is making known demands about timing - especially to have the debates on weekdays when viewership will be high.

And WHEN. Bernie wants weekdays when viewership is high with no competition like the last ones with Star Wars, football, and Christmas shopping.

There have been three debates so far and they were on the weekend when viewership is low and they competed with Star Wars, football, and Christmas shopping. The debates were important because the unknown candidates needed them for exposure. Clearly, they were not significant enough to be adequate. We do indeed need

Some will take it however they want, it doesn’t mean that it is substantiated with facts. I think with O’Malley out, who Sanders wanted to be treated fairly, they now have to figure out what to do with extra time, one on one interaction, cross talk, rebuttal, etc. It makes sense to draw lines in the sand when your

No one agreed until Hillary saw her poll numbers drop. Why would he help her make a come back on her own terms? Plus, O’Malley dropped out one night ago, this requires changes in negotiations. She is spinning this and you are falling for it.

Circumstances have changed. Martin O’Malley is no longer in the debates, so of course he needs to renogotiate conditions or she will just exploit them anyway. She’s a former lawyer after all.

The previous debates have been on days that would not allow normal people to sit and watch. They were on weekends, they had to compete with Star Wars, football, and Christmas shopping. I would say, no, the previous debates were not scheduled considerately and we definitely need more on Monday or Tuesday nights when