vanestle1
Vanestle1
vanestle1

He really does!

That’s a good point; people would have singled out the domestic violence part of it and hammered away at him. And I would agree, that’s one thing I’ve always liked about him, he does seem to have a propensity for forward thinking, which I believe is rare, I dunno if by necessity or design, in politics these days.

I think I get what you mean, but I’m getting a little tripped up in the idea of supporting something you think is wrong as “good judgement,” though. It begs the question of...why. Either way, thank you for your response, and for being nice about it :)

Seriously!!

Ah! I'm always telling people that! Being passive aggressive is really just a more devious/sneaky way of being aggressive.

I've always leaned toward Clinton, but thought he seemed like a pretty solid, grounded, decent person. After watching his reactions??? I think his ego must be insanely big. He comes off as so entitled. At least to me.

I want to preface this by saying I truly mean this question to be genuine, I am not trying to make a dig at Sander’s, nor am I trying to put some kind of Halo on Clinton. Back when this was passed, theoretically some politicians thought it was...good. The Clintons being the example here. Others didn’t...Sanders being

This one drives me crazy. To some people if you have a uterus, and vote for Clinton, you're automatically deemed to be voting for her ONLY because of the uterus in common. It's bullshit.

Holy shit, what an ass!

I absolutely thought this in 2008 as a result of some of his extremely stupid statements.

Man, what a crock of shit!

I really had a lot of respect for him at first. The closer this gets to the end, the more that respect decreases due to his reactions. He's just another politician, and I hope people can see that now. Long gone is the respectful person acting like he was so above the squabbling politicians.

“Crazy uncle yelling at a cloud" made me actually laugh out loud :)

There is no logic to your argument. No one is claiming they should be paid more for no other reason than they are women, they’re saying they should be paid more because they bring in more revenue, have more exposure, are ranked higher, and are more successful. Is that true with the WNBA and NBA? Nope. Apples and

If this was repeatedly the 6th person stating he had assaulted them, it seems like the school dropped the ball in a massive way. They could have prevented some of this.

That was a very impressive picture of “Chad” you just painted!! :) Yeah, the deft instead of daft gave me some joy, I can’t lie. At least be verbally abiding the correct way!! I wasn’t aware of this dismiss button, but feel I’ll likely use it often... :/

Does he have an unusually long neck?

Please don’t apologize! I’ve enjoyed it as well. I was called “deft” (pretty sure they meant “daft”), have had my education questioned (actually, they said it failed me), etc., etc. all because I have...wait for it...an opinion! :) There is a ton of bullying taking place. I feel as though if I’m not giving people shot

I was just recently (maybe two weeks ago) made aware he hasn’t been a lifelong democrat. And now, because it’s still new knowledge, I keep forgetting. When I remember that, though, I get all the more irritated. He knew the rules going in. If he wasn’t ok with them he should have sacrificed the benefit of more exposure