Of course she is. For her work in a *musical*. Because she’s a very talented singer/actor.

She’s not some blockbuster Hollywood movie star out of her element here. She’s a singer/actor cast in a musical.

It’s also possible that people keep voting for Bernie because she’s so close to locking up the nomination.

If she really feels that way, she should audition for all future jobs under a pseudonym.

How exactly was she “used”? She's an actor/singer cast in a musical. Seems like it's the kind of job she would want.

They’re still scalpers, buying up tickets solely to resell them.

She may in fact be the first actor in history cast not for her talent, but because of her name recognition.

Yeah, these two are scummy enough. Schilling was apparently just a scum too far.

Democratic candidates.

“Unfortunately I’m not optimistic at all about a Trump/Hillary matchup. Bernie had a far better chance in the general”

They did that in 2012 as well, insisting that the race was a toss-up down to the wire, even as 538 was giving Obama an 80-90% chance to win.

“I don’t think he cares about party unity or down ticket votes”

Words also have power to reveal a person’s true motivations and true character. And when they do, nothing wrong with pointing that out.

That’s the reason “SJW” was coined in the first place.

It would be much better to keep the organization rolling, so you don’t have to ramp back up in the general. It’s only a couple months away.

Reproductive rights are being taken away on a state level in a major way. We need people fighting for social issues on the national level to counter those efforts in the states.

It’s going to get silly if he pushes it any further. We don't need SCOTUS to rule on the fine points of this particular contract.

But that’s not happening. And that’s not going to happen. Which is why anybody who spreads that nonsense actually is an idiot.

What's the grain of truth?

But that’s not what’s happening.