"Dealers have said that their system is better for customers because it allows for services like financing, trade-ins and maintenance."
Late last week, two bills came before the New York State Assembly that would have made it illegal to register cars…
Certainly not. It inserts a middleman in between the manufacturer and the consumer, both cutting the profits of the manufacturer and driving up prices for the consumer. It's a relic of the early 20th century and is no longer needed by the manufacturers.
Cunts have a remarkable way of organizing and banding together.
It's funny how the dealer's are just scared that other automakers will take notice and try to do the same, that's why they are trying to "nip it in the bud" before that happens. A manufacturer directly selling their product to a consumer will only benefit everyone, as there will be less mark-up from manufacturer to…
What I find interesting is the limited spread here. The worst car is only twice as likely to have problems than the best? I think there's a lot of inter model variation being hidden here as well as the possibility that poor initial quality is more hit-or-miss than every car rolling off the line faulty.
Nigerian, you said?
Unless they are using wider rubber, the rear track looks wider.
Does that mean you disagree with me?
Only that it is much harder to dupe an informed consumer. Carfax, and its competitors, are a benefit to the consumer, not an unscrupulous dealer. I'm in the "collision industry" and am active with an industry organization called CIC (Collision Industry Conference). It's an organization that is comprised of all players…
And honestly, the fact that you quote Top Gear as serious automotive journalists... Really?