I read it.... Back in ‘96, thanks. And no, you didn’t give up all or even most of them. Some, yes.

I expanded on my initial reply in response to other comments. My issue wasn’t the relationship. I thought that was evident.

Read some more of the replies in this discussion.....

My issue is the info on the phone and not the phone itself. It’s extremely difficult to prove who sent a text, even when it is known what phone it came from.....

Even under the UCMJ you still do have certain rights.

Cybertron needs you!

...and aa portion of them believe it unequivocally.

*Cough Cough* Princess Diana *Cough Cough*

....and those are protected unless a trial occurs and they are required for same....

Question: Who in their right mind would ram a full size 4 wheeled vehicle, presumably over 3,000 pounds, with an ATV?

For the record, I was a ramp tramp ;)

www.fromtheinside.us › SEARCHES

https://www.flexyourrights.org/faqs/does-the-…

https://www.flexyourrights.org/faqs/does-the-…

I’ll concede that, the article gives me the impression this is not the case though.

You give up some rights, but the way this reads gives the impression of an illegal search and seizure. Someone mentioned the possibility of the phone being one issued for official use. In that case it’s fine. My personal phone though? Do what law enforcement would do. Petition for a subpoena of the records.

You give up a lot, but not everything. And nor should you roll over if accused falsely.

You missed my point entirely. My point was the tactics used during investigation were seedy, unethical, and borderline criminal themselves. Before you throw names around, perhaps sit back and re-read a post so you can understand what is being conveyed.

Phone seized for a supposed “inappropriate relationship?” Civil rights violations much?

#nailedit