user46
user46
user46

LET’S TALK ABOUT GODDAMN EVERTON.

Mourinho and Costa spend more time whining than they do managing/playing soccer respectively. I love watching Chelsea lose.

If the Barbie movie is anything like Barbie: Life in the Dreamhouse, I will be happy.

Angeleno here. I was around during the 1984 games, which turned a $200 million profit. I don’t remember there being a ton of new facilities built, but I do remember old buildings being shored up and the Exposition Park area around the Coliseum getting considerably spiffier. The facilities are still there and in use.

Of course it was Philly. Can we disown that city?

I don’t think they deserved to be in the final at all. I think that it should have been either Panama or Costa Rica. I would have preferred for them to get knocked out as they rightly should have. However, terrible ref decisions can’t get in the way of the team’s actual strengths. Mexico had one of the best midfields

Disagree on both counts.

Thanks for stopping by Grandma. I promise to call you sometime between now and Thanksgiving.

What puzzles me about this article (and all other’s that I’ve read in regards to this situation) is that:

A magnificent article like this, deserves a Douglas Adams quote. “Space is big, like reall.....

The Worst Thing You’ve Ever Seen on an Airplane...

The film relies on every character in every situation to make the absolute stupidest decision possible at every point in order to advance the ‘plot.’

“But the more money it makes, the more I feel it sucks.”

Jurassic world was fun in the way cartoons are fun, if you are going to read deeply in it it will suck, just indulge yourself in the nonsense of Tree-frogtor saurusquid and trained raptors and a a silly badguy who wasn’t really a badguy but just a militairy bully.

If the characters were smart, the dinosaurs wouldn’t get out and there wouldn’t be a movie. People are stupid in real life. I don’t know why stupid people in a movie makes it a bad movie.

To be fair, 85-90% of the decision making in the original JP was characters making the stupidest decision possible at nearly every point in order to advance the plot. However it worked because everyone had clear motivations and were likeable (even the worst aspects of the ‘bad’ humans never rose above asshole).

It does, but it glosses over TLW and JP3 very quickly. They don’t even mention Isla Sorna by name IIRC.

That absolutely is not what we should be analyzing. The argument that we should be highlighting the feminist angle of this would only serve to promote back-patting about how far that movement has come in the last 50 years, compared to the indignation and outrage over oppressive and frequently state-enforced policy and

I disagree, thats not what either book is about.

I refuse to read this. I read her first book cover to cover and it was worthless...absolutely no advice on how to actually kill a mockingbird. No thanks, I’ll just read the instruction manual if I need to go set a watch, man.