Actually, this is not the only video of him saying racial slurs, as wells as joking that he should join the KKK. So it was not something he did 10 years ago and never did again. Not to mention - people generally don't use racial slurs one day and just happen to get caught that one time.

I don't find it at all surprising that while borrowing from Black culture and music, he looked down upon actual Black people. This is not uncommon.

Man, future society is screwed...

Sigh...I don't feel like educating today, past saying that it's "should have" not "should of". Please Google why it's a problem to call people "fag", why it's not "funny", and why it's not "bullshit" to get upset over the word.

I've finally watched this, and I have my fingers crossed that it will become apparent in the next episode that he filmed the scene with the intentions you ascribe to him. It was sooo uncomfortable to watch, and even my boyfriend was like "What is he doing??? Why did he do that?" It was a good moment, because we…

I'm getting that people are annoyed that the female body is being deemed "unfit for children", and that it's weird that this particular ad is being singled out when this is par for the course where perfume ads are concerned.

You know...I've never used homophobic or racial slurs, either. I curse like a sailor and have a decent vocabulary, so maybe I just don't need to? Those aren't the words that come to mind for me when I'm angry, for whatever reason. So it is possible to not do that.

The elderly white woman, hands down. White people like this guy don't want to be told about racism from non-white people. It can only be heard, digested, and possibly believed coming from a fellow white person.

No.

Dude...what the fuck are you talking about???

I'm so sorry. We're with you.

This scared the shit out of me!

Hmmm...I don't know. Sounds a little close to the respectability stuff, or linking modest dressing with treatment. Surely you don't mean to say that the way a woman is dressed should dictate how she is treated, and that the only way to be progressive is to be covered up...?

I guess because it's not objectifying if it's a choice you make for yourself?

I love it when (supposedly) celibate men who have no financial responsibilities lecture normals about life.

Right?!

I'm not against the style for anyone else, it's just not for me.

This woman didn't get the memo I guess...

"Using the character at random for fan service"? What does that even mean? And couldn't that be said about any character?

Then casting this particular Oscar-winning actress shouldn't bother you, right? I don't see how she's "random". We don't even know which character she'll play.