It's cheesy at best. It's like when two ideologies argue, and one brings Hitler in - it's just cheap. The Witcher 2 did something similar, but I think they went one step further - they made the player uncertain whether or not what Geralt did was good or bad, often forcing him to choose between two evils. That game…

Of course. Making shit art is not taking a risk, it is just being shit. The Hitman trailer in question however is far from shit. I'm generally not a fan of games about women in their panties, but that trailer in particular is one the best, if not the best representation of fetish culture in games to date. Simply…

All risks are risks we ought to be taking. Artists should be given complete freedom to do as they please, without worrying that they may annoy any particular interest group.

I think with MK you have 2 things - MK is famous for comedic violence and the violence is not focused exclusively on women. With the Hitman Absolution trailer (which I loved, mind you I love fetish nuns), you have fetish ladies having the crap beaten out of them for no particular reason, and you don't have any context…

My point exactly - if you stay out of it, you can remain neutral. But if you want to be involved in some dispute, you need to know where you stand.

Decent countries have much more to offer than this binary choice. :P

I actually addressed that - the only way you can remain neutral is if you take on both sides or not get involved. If you don't get involved in the conflict, you don't have to pick a side... but especially with a war - you either pick a side or you stay out. You either pick The Horde or The Alliance, or you do not…

I think I found this video hilarious for all the wrong reason. One in particular being the black kid that had subtitles.

Eh, you don't get to help the 2 armies in a war. Of course you'd say I am being unintelligent. Try to have a football match with 2 players being neutral.

By "limiting your interactions" I think you mean "I engage everyone in this thread".

I'll elaborate - every time you make a generalization, regardless if it is positive or negative, about any group of society that is defined by traits beyond their control (sex, race, etc. etc.) it is racist, sexist, etc. -ist, unless you can back it up with empirical data. Like women generally have vaginas isn't…

Because the word 'analogy' is too sophisticated for the likes of you.

I don't know how "cis" is used in chemistry. I googled it and I found that cis in the context of chemistry has entirely different meaning than it does in the context of gender self-identification. So no - they're not morons. I didn't know that cis was used in chemistry, thank you for pointing that out. :)

Yes, it means exactly that. It is when your gender identity matches your sex. So every male who is content with being male... is cis male. That is all it is. The origin of the term comes from one moron doctor, who mutilated the penis of a child when he wanted to circumcise him, then said that he could raise that child…

I find it interesting that you'd say that because of an obvious joke. The joke was so obvious, that it is sad that you need to have it explained. It is about arbitrary preferences about how we should refer to groups of people. Now, the OP claims that referring to females as females is somewhat insulting, it…

You think that women are as unfunny as a generic tumblrette and can't take a joke? I'm happy to see that you assume women suffer from the same inability to understand a joke that you suffer from.

Everyone who uses "cis-" seriously is a moron in my book.

Go back to tumblr, you moron. Now, what the passed out people had in common was that they were all females. Their gender identities are irrelevant to the article, mostly because they were passed out... you know, you can't ask someone about their gender identity if they are passed out. So yes - they were females…

Biggest hypocrites in the world. Yapping about natural balance, then distorting it by causing lightning storms. I don't have time for hypocrites.

In a war, you have to pick a side, or stay out. There is no option. The moment you insert yourself in a war, you either have to be able to take on all sides, or pick a team.