Looks like the junior high kids are out on summer break.

Pro-life murderer.

The person in this article is arguing that we should cater to incels by pressuring women to have sex with them in order to stop the incels from killing women. So true, no one is currently catering to them, but the solutions these jackasses are coming up with would certainly cater to them.

Worse than being whiny little assholes (which they are), they ignore their own logic. If natural selection really is a thing, they’re simply losing and (apparently) can’t accept it.

If they need sex so much, why don’t they just fuck each other? Why do they have to victimize women? They like each other more anyway.

And let’s extrapolate this further: Can I retaliate against a prospective employer who didn’t hire me and receive the same sympathetic analysis? Rejection is a part of life. And it’s formative. Mature people learn from it. Immature people obsess over their rejections and blame others for their unhappiness.

If that’s the case, then perhaps we can send the Incels to go live amongst the chimps.

but according to him, men represent order and women represent chaos. You can’t make this shit up. Except Peterson can, because it’s obviously alllllll made the fuck up.

Yes, but when you say it without all the pretense like that, it just sounds silly and awful.

Yeah, I’m a researcher, and the common trait of grad students writing their first research paper is....use as many 50 cent words as possible, claim your work is crucial to solving a major societal problem, and do not include any useful details that would enable others to reproduce your work. Papers written by students…

They won’t though. They’re “too good” for that. It’s tens or nothing.

Or, you could try to be a decent guy from the get-go, lower your standards to non-supermodel, non-genius virgins (like women have had to), and then get laid. Oh, I’m sorry, you wanted a way to force women above your pay grade to sleep with you? Oops. My bad.

“Nothing should be equally distributed, except the things I want and can’t get on my own.”

Or, you know, we could imprison incels, since they can’t control their violent urges. We don’t cater to pedophiles to stop them from molesting children. We don’t cater to thieves. We don’t cater to drug dealers. Why should we cater to incels again?

And also- everyone has been rejected at some point in their life. Coping with rejection is an essential life skill. It makes me crazy to hear the same conservatives who rail about participation trophies and entitlement turn around and act like it’s understandable to murder someone for saying “no” to you!

Pretty much. And as awful as he is, he’s only really promoting an extreme version of what sexist conservative thought pretty much espouses. It encourages people to get married so women won’t be sluts and so that men have a woman at home to take care of them, cook their meals, but also to keep them in line and stop men…

If I see one more article using the words “romantic” or “spurned” and implicitly laying this girl’s death and others at her feet for making the shooter do this, I will set something on fire. Conservatives are all over this, with their “if she had just been nice to him!” schtick that does nothing but harm women and…

Wow, what a shocking and completely unforeseeable turn of events in this tragedy.

and also so they can procreate because we need more pyscho assholes in the world...

Welcome to White Male Culture. From slavery to capitalism to sex to imperialism, it’s always been: “Give me what I want or I will kill you.”