If that’s the case, then perhaps we can send the Incels to go live amongst the chimps.
If that’s the case, then perhaps we can send the Incels to go live amongst the chimps.
but according to him, men represent order and women represent chaos. You can’t make this shit up. Except Peterson can, because it’s obviously alllllll made the fuck up.
Yes, but when you say it without all the pretense like that, it just sounds silly and awful.
Yeah, I’m a researcher, and the common trait of grad students writing their first research paper is....use as many 50 cent words as possible, claim your work is crucial to solving a major societal problem, and do not include any useful details that would enable others to reproduce your work. Papers written by students…
They won’t though. They’re “too good” for that. It’s tens or nothing.
Or, you could try to be a decent guy from the get-go, lower your standards to non-supermodel, non-genius virgins (like women have had to), and then get laid. Oh, I’m sorry, you wanted a way to force women above your pay grade to sleep with you? Oops. My bad.
“Nothing should be equally distributed, except the things I want and can’t get on my own.”
Or, you know, we could imprison incels, since they can’t control their violent urges. We don’t cater to pedophiles to stop them from molesting children. We don’t cater to thieves. We don’t cater to drug dealers. Why should we cater to incels again?
And also- everyone has been rejected at some point in their life. Coping with rejection is an essential life skill. It makes me crazy to hear the same conservatives who rail about participation trophies and entitlement turn around and act like it’s understandable to murder someone for saying “no” to you!
Pretty much. And as awful as he is, he’s only really promoting an extreme version of what sexist conservative thought pretty much espouses. It encourages people to get married so women won’t be sluts and so that men have a woman at home to take care of them, cook their meals, but also to keep them in line and stop men…
If I see one more article using the words “romantic” or “spurned” and implicitly laying this girl’s death and others at her feet for making the shooter do this, I will set something on fire. Conservatives are all over this, with their “if she had just been nice to him!” schtick that does nothing but harm women and…
Wow, what a shocking and completely unforeseeable turn of events in this tragedy.
and also so they can procreate because we need more pyscho assholes in the world...
Welcome to White Male Culture. From slavery to capitalism to sex to imperialism, it’s always been: “Give me what I want or I will kill you.”
Could you perhaps arrive at a point already?
Depends on the reddit forum they are coming from. Incels are the lonely, angry virgins, Red Pills are the weirdos who think its alpha to emotionally abuse your family and cheat on your partner and PUAs are just a bunch of pervs who think women are objects and wear stupid hats.
This is the trait that I think the “dark web” folks really have in common, shared by a number of alt-right characters. They are not engaging in rigorous debate, they are playing with debate tricks. Peterson, Yiannopolis, even Kellyanne Conway have perfected a style of argumentation that plays well in tv…
I said this some where else but his theory is proven correct by the total lack of violence towards women who are involved in long term and or married relationships. Yep, he nailed that one.
So if singleness is the cause of men’s violence it stands to reason that the rates of domestic abuse among long term and married couples is close to zerooooohhhhhh, oops. Next up, Jordan Peterson’s newest book: The only thing that pacifies men is assaulting Women, and why this is okay.
But the crux of the story, and the one he contests, is his suggestion that society return to “enforced monogamy” to prevent incels from murdering people: