unusuallylargeglottis
Unusually Large Glottis
unusuallylargeglottis

And it sports a Frunk (or a Foot if you are in the UK?).

It is an interesting article, but I wasn’t referring to it. I’m referring to discussions I had 30 years ago with my Archeology professor. Mostly it amounted to “We don’t know.”

A low quality car means I’m more likely to buy another car in 5 years, but I’ll be damned if it’s the same brand. ;)


A higher quality car means that you’re less likely to buy a new one in five years.

As a kid of the 80s I can confirm the use of ‘fag’ was typically meant to playfully rip on a guy for doing something less than masculine, not to suggest that he was actually gay.  Having said that, it’s a word that has well passed its use-by date.

I don’t really get this genre, the same with that show with Ewan MacGregor riding around the world. What’s the appeal in wandering around courting danger? Is it some self-destructive impulse or are many people’s lives so devoid of real challenges, real suffering that they’re driven to seek it out? I don’t get

LOLOLOLOL not sure why you think I'm not talking about Democrats too but ok bud. You sure did infer a lot from a simple statement conveying my disdain for politicians in general. 

He means diversity in opinion about the most important issues of the day. While most African Americans would probably say institutional racism and police brutality are key issues, you don’t have the same solidarity with Latinos. Central Americans might be more concerned about refugees, while Mexican Americans more

Thus the hubris of today’s internet aficionado.

Addendum: Amateurs should be aware of the artist, art style, history and context before making an assessment. But I guess this is where we are in history. Where the common layman is now going to condense a career of over 45 years into 145 characters of artistic ignorance. Also how often do we see darker skin on

Amateurs shouldn’t critique art.

FIN

This may be one of those things where people say “he shouldve kept his opinion to himself”, which is true. But its his opinion. We’ve reached the point in society where someone needs to publicly apologize for the fact that he said hes not attracted to a woman other people thinks is attractive. He said nothing wrong,

I think every human who has ever lived has discussed the hotness of someone else at some point. I’m kinda confused why we’re either shocked or furious about this. Beauty has always been an opinion.

182 horses offered by the 2.5 liter, four-cylinder engine in the Sport trim will only be in the Sport trim.

I just don't understand everyone's confusion with the current naming convention. Were you dropped as a child repeatedly or something? It changed. Get over it. 

Yeah, when “that certain crowd” weighs in with the physics of the thread torque and the offense to humanity to use a little anti-seize of some sort?

I think for this critique to make sense, you would need to point out an instance where the OP claimed that the facts in the vetted journalism were fake news.

I get the sentiment, but it’s the logic I have difficulty with.

Jalops: all cars look this same! this is bad!