Iggy isn’t even relevant in a video about being cheated on by her fiancé. Poor thing.

The fucking entitlement. I mean, I’m an atheist; I don’t think there’s anything left in those bones. But using someone else’s remains, someone you never knew, never sought consent from, to perform your crackpot religious rites is fucking wrong.

That she found a much older man isn’t the story here. It’s that the much older man happens to be Jon Lovitz. And that they teased out the big reveal over several meticulously crafted Instagram posts.

Golf courses and gravesites have a lot in common in that they take up valuable land space that could be used for housing people instead of housing the physically and spiritually dead.

I am not superstitious, and even I would be in church every day for a year if I was the butcher who sliced up that monstrosity.

I can understand how some people might mistake that for Satan, but that is clearly the archangel Gabriel’s cat named Snickers that jumped on the food image transmitter.

Had roast lamb for dinner and am about to visit a stone circle before drinking my body weight in prosecco and eating an entire Heston Blumenthal chocolate egg (“with edible ‘nest’”). This is how we deal.

snapchat shows that the party was catered by mcdonalds, wendys and taco bell lol

I want to make fun, but I recently went to a dog’s birthday party where the host had one of those photo booth setups in her backyard. With lighting.

“...descend into autism...”

The answer to your questions are:

The guy that runs Fark, wrote a book called; It’s Not News, It’s Fark: How Mass Media Tries to Pass Off Crap as News. It includes a chapter titled, “Equal Time for Nutjobs,” about how the media likes to give the opposite side of a story, even when it’s proven to be untrue for “the conversation,” when really they’re…

Big ol’ softbox bounced off the ceiling, from the looks of it.

the First Amendment does not apply here. This is a private film festival. The first amendment is designed to prevent the government from punishing or preventing speech and expression. An organizer deciding to pull a film from a festival has zero first amendment implications.

Well, good. Wakefield can go peddle his double-down propaganda piece on fringe cruises and to the tinfoil-hat crowd. The Tribeca Film Festival risked their reputation screening this dreck, and it seems that finally sank in.

hey ladies will one of you please flip the fucking camera around so we can all know what type of lighting setup makes such perfect selfies?? is there a filter on one of the lights that is fuzzing all yalls skin up so nicely?

I agree. I don’t like people who treat service staff badly, or who bring pointless nuisance lawsuits, but she had a signed contract for these things so I don’t understand why the hotel would think she shouldn’t get them.

Honestly, while it would’ve been nice to know she understood her luck in the lottery of life, I can’t really hate on her either.

How dare she push for something that she was contractually entitled to, how dare she. I’m sure she probably was an asshole in other ways, but I’m on her side in not letting them slide on those ones.

Although I general hate people who treat other people badly (‘paying customer’ status does not justify being an a-hole), I do derive some pleasure from the thought that she maybe gave Drumpf all hell.