‘whether they want to remember their child as their son or as their daughter is their business, not yours.’

This is fucked up. Once we lose empathy, we really lose everything, He had an opinion which rendered himself vulnerable by expressing his discomfort with being seeing himself as some typical ‘hunk.’ Of course women have had to deal with that shit since forever, but it could have been a much more interesting…

You’re a special kind of stupid, aren’t you?

"That was very interesting to me, as an evolutionary psychologist, that it reflects kind of ancestral tendencies."

I am in a listicle mood today, so:

Fake site and bullshit photoshop created by you Blue and Black truthers. Makes me wanna PUKE *huffs more spraypaint*

Ever have one of those singluar laughs that is so incredibly loud and almost painful that you think you just ruptured an organ?

Why exactly are you trying to argue me out of feeling grossed out by eating bodily waste? What, are you trying to earn internet points for "the weirdest argument won"? It's very simple. Body gets the bad stuff out. If you then eat it, you put the bad stuff back in. Not good for the body. Body evolves a natural…

BREASTMILK IS MEANT TO BE CONSUMED ORALLY.

Yeah. But no.

Somehow I suspect that the notion of semen fro-yo would gross most people out as well.

And yet, still, no matter the topic, if it's something people want to believe, they'll go after any possible little bit of meat like a pack of wolves. Damned the research! It's what i want to hear, so it must be true!!!

She just loves to be a victim

The tears of Gamergaters are delicious.

You should read about her ex-boyfriend talking with Buzzfeed about how he doesn't regret what he's started with all this in wanting to retaliate against her. He admitted to spending a month planning it out, writing out a plan and thinking of contingencies. He really comes off as being rather mentally unbalanced.

Isn't that how liberation works? Only one group of people can have equality at a time? NO? WELL GODDAMN.

It's not about glorification, exactly. And I understand the argument about villains being bad guys, and all that. But...

Well, when you see writers using the victimization of helpless women (often sexually, but sometimes through non-sexual violence) over and over and over again as a shortcut to signify villainy, it…

Ah, but see, it's not simply about the fact that women are killed. It's the fact that those women are used as, essentially, props. Worse yet, they're usually sexualized props, adding a weird sexual angle to the violence committed against them. Often, it's a "kick the dog" moment, where an agency-free female character…

If her arguments are shallow and dishonest, it should be trivially easy to provide an intellectually rigorous, honest rebuttal of them. I have yet to see anyone actually do that.

I've seen some critiques take (nuanced) issue with some of her points, and that's good! That's how this sort of discussion is supposed to…

"Cherry pick data"? If you're referring to Sarkeesian's videos, that's...not what's going on. Like, at all. Unless, of course, you want to argue that a huge chunk of academic cultural and media criticism is "cherry picking data".

And everyone has a political agenda. Choosing not to talk about this stuff is political;…