When did she badmouth him on twitter?

No, unless she’s been mismanaging her money, then Ciara’s net worth should be higher than Future’s. Her career has been longer. She’s sold more albums, toured longer and played to larger crowds in her prime. She also has a bigger endorsement portfolio.

Is it morally better for me to just sit around playing one game for the thousandth time because society doesn’t consider me worthy to have more spending power than I do? Do game developers believe only people of a certain socioeconomic level are worthy of playing their games?

Not you trying to turn gaming piracy into a social justice issue . . . Hilarious! Games are a luxury good, not a human right.

“A bootleg IG model version” of ANTM is actually kind of a novel idea. The contestants could find new ways to pose with waist trainers and detox teas.

Vh1 is the home of the Basketball Wives and Love and Hip-Hop, and Tran would fit right in with those women. People who keep up with those shows will tune in just to see CB’s ex speak on camera.

Liked because of your Janeway avi

I mean, I don’t disagree entirely, but your gripe about hip-hop has been repeated ad naseum for decades, literally.

It goes pretty hard. People just don’t want to admit it because it’s her.

If you do a lot of sitting, then I would highly recommend hip stretches for beginning runners. Your (presumably tight) hip-flexors will thank you.

I find that the brand of the shoe can be very important. I went through a lot of sneaker brands and a lot of blisters before I discovered Asics. They can get pricey, but my feet don’t hurt after running anymore.

69 million followers and she can’t get a hit album or a top five hit. The world is a confusing place.

Exactly. You don’t hear Kim denying what Kanye said about getting her blessing before releasing that song where Ye calls Taylor a bitch and says that he made her famous and can still fuck her, but we’re sleep, tho.

Exactly. Between the one trying to convince me that Kelly was victim blaming, but not attacking Kesha, (as if blaming someone isn't attacking them by default) and No-Mi even finding Kelly’s statements about being an AI winner problematic, the prevailing logic here seems to be that no one should wonder aloud why they…

To blame someone is to attack them by default. You can’t assert that what Kelly said wasn’t victim blaming, “per se,” and then end your statement with “But it’s still victim-blaming.” This whole exchange/argument is becoming laughably circular.

You’re asserting that Kelly is victim blaming. Victim blaming is an attack. Kelly also said that she thinks having the clout of being the first AI winner may have also had something to do with why she has never been sexually assaulted in the industry. So, does that mean that Kelly thinks negatively of Kesha for not…

She never said that it couldn't happen to her. Kelly speculated about why she thinks it has never happened to her. Whether or not you find Kelly’s opinion ignorant does not mean that it was an attack on others, which is what you originally asserted.

Kelly’s saying that she thinks no one ever tried to assault her because no one saw her as a sex object. She’s describing how the industry and the public perceive her, not blaming pop stars who have sexualized personas and can trade on their looks.

You mean Jewish men and Asian women or just Asian women and white men, in general?

I think they came out in the wrong order. The girl was probably supposed to be in the middle as “Bao Ling.” And the little Asian boy being “David Moskovitz” is totally believable given how common Jewish male/Asian female pairings are.