ughburner977536980033
ughburner977536980033
ughburner977536980033

why? If a woman says she’s wearing a no makeup look when she’s clearly wearing makeup it’s, at the very minimum, creating unnatural beauty standards.

I’m going to bet on this trend lasting for all of two selfies. Women who aren’t photographed for a living will continue to wear or not wear makeup as they always did, and stars will continue to do spend a ton of time making sure they look perfect in pictures.

From some interviews I’ve read, it seems she and Ryder became pretty close, so hopefully that’s one adult in her corner that knows the ins and outs of being a young celebrity that can help her out and be an actual adult for her.

She’s twelve, and it sounds like her parent sold their business to move to Hollywood when she was eight. Last year, the family was broke and living with relatives. So, yeah, all of this is early enough in her life that it makes me think this was someone else’s idea rather than hers (which doesn’t mean that she may not

How old is this kid? They didn’t go almost bankrupt overnight, did they start grooming her to save them from their troubles before she was old enough to even independently have the urge to act? This is just automatically gross. I find it hard to believe there is any context that doesn’t make this gross.

Poor girl. She’s gonna get Lohan’d if no one is careful with her.

This left me feeling gross. She’s a kid for fucks sake. She shouldn’t be saving her family from bankruptcy.

But Ferrante isn’t a celebrity. The woman behind the name chose to remain unknown. That’s the whole reason why she published under a pseudonym!

agreed. I have no idea why “to analyze the work” is being used as a reason for this. Like... you have literature. And you have literature studies. You are never given all the facts you would like for a literature analysis - we may know the actual identities of authors who were writing 200 years ago, yet our

But, really, isn’t historical analysis of an author’s life just academics making work for themselves?

So you have to reveal your full identity or not be a writer? That’s a bullshit argument.

as a fiction writer and literary analyst - simply, no. a writer’s project should be analyzed out of context with its author’s identity, especially if it’s published as fiction. fiction is an artistic, intellectual exercise, one in which the resulting content most often has nothing to do with author, the author’s

Rant: I never thought I would say this considering its Kim K, but I don’t think this was faked for “attention whoring”. Say what you will about her but my gut tells me this isn’t the kind of shit she’d lie about fur attention. Robberies DO happen, and when you consider someone of her wealth this is a reality that has

I can’t imagine how terrified she must have been. No matter how rich you are or whatever, this is a really fucked up thing to have happen to you. The jewelry is insured/can be replaced/is just stuff, but her peace of mind is surely shattered for a long time if not forever.

With the buttons on its shoulder, George’s ‘sharp little sweater’ is a Breton sweater. Not sure what kind of coded message that is sending? Trying to butter up the French Canadians?

They’re toddlers. This is probably an appropriate level of “dressed up” that they can be without it being far too uncomfortable. Additionally, I can imagine they want to show a level of respect in their dress code and not show up in whatever was on sale at Target (see: my kids).

With that said, I wish I had the cash

Come on, Ashley, you missed the worst best one:

Oh YEAH? I heard that Hillary FORCED Chelsea to suck on her breasts for YEARS.

Look, how else is a man supposed to compliment his daughter when the only compliments he knows how to give any woman are that he finds her attractive enough to have sex with?

Trump is going to skip the next debate and instead host a pay-per-view where he will literally make out with his daughter.