yes, i agree with you— i got your point and that is why i gave you a star (twice); as for the rest, i have already made my case. it will be interesting to look on the current era in 40 years and have someone say, “well, you have to understand, ___ was not as frowned upon back then as it is now.” because rest assured…

and *again* i know that predators stay within their orientation whatever that may be.

NEWMAN!

what was it?

but...

you nailed it. at first, he was saying a few worthwhile things, but he forgot the Law of Holes.

yeah he got lucky twice.

not to mention what had to have been a statutory rape situation with nastassja kinski (unless he took advantage of just the right country’s laws).

“...the ‘70s were weird and way more permissive about sex with underage girls than we are now...”

i read your thing, and it was familiar terrain, which is why i think of those men as closeted. like here and here.

blaah, i am so confused. it links to a tweet from a news site that makes no mention of antisemitism or icke. is kinja a SLIDERS portal?

— hilarisad

CREEPY JOE, YOU’RE NEXT.

oh we most assuredly are!

and a very traditional kind of shit— the kind that gets women to do their emotional labor, or in this case PR/tweeting, b/c that’s women’s work!

alt + 154 = Ü & alt + 0220 = Ü

i kept my wording curt to avoid offense, as i knew it might be touchy, so thanks for understanding. family friends adopted a child who would have grown up in a thai brothel, so my experience is different, as is my p.o.v., but we are free to disagree. thanks again for your considered reply.

i got your point, and i countered that the content itself perpetuated the cycle.

i think of those men as closeted.