Work it, bitch

with no context for this game, i will say that the logo at half court kills me

Goddamn it’s fun to watch him run down a block.

Not golf. Pizza child sex rings. And guess what? She doesn’t want you to know how much time she spends eating pizza off of children...? Do the children make the pizzas too? Better go grab my guns and take a look.

Huh, lot of awful white people.

White men. Out of 38 around the table (not counting Trump), there are 31 white men, 6 white women, and 1 black man. Even by C-suite standards, that’s really white and extra-male.

freedom of speech sometimes comes with consequences, my good bitch.

Saw this come across my twitter and only immediately read, “Sean Dolittle: Refugees aren’t...”

I braced myself for impact but was pleasantly surprised/relieved when I scrolled further. Good for you for speaking up, Sean. Don’t let the mouthbreathers get you down.

This still makes me laugh

Please let “Good Dogs Of Famous World Leaders” be a running thing.

Not really. It’s just reflecting that as you’ve enjoyed more success, you’ve also used government services more. Who do you think benefits more from our military? Executives at multinational corporations, whose trade routes are guarded by our armed services, or someone making 50k a year?

Like, the fuck do people expect him to say?

I know right? Failing blog Deadspin at it again

What is this article? This has nothing about the Cardinals losing a baseball game.

That type of logic is a pillar of the Round-Earth conspiracy. Everyone knows that the world really works on Asteroids rules, wherein if you travel off the edge of one screen you appear from the edge of the next.

My only explanation is that maybe JUST MAYBE a guy who has focused on basketball his entire life and has more than likely couldn’t name 15 elements off of the periodic table is very stupid in every other subject other than basketball. He’s so ignorant of the mounds of evidence out there, that he is in a matter of…

yeah, because they don’t cover “the earth is round” until your 4th year at Duke.

It's all a matter of opinion, I suppose. In the end if you enjoy what you do and you feel good about the work you've done then you just shrug off the critics and whatever negative labels they might be tossing in your general direction.

Why? The one reason I can see for it in the article boils down to it being a derisive and snarky way to make the same criticism, and you as an employee of Gawker have absolutely zero grounds for trying to tell people not to act in that fashion.

I get why clickbait isn't acceptable to use for some sorts of criticisms, but how do you figure it's not acceptable to use in the case of a misleading headline designed to make people think that a fairly mundane article is not mundane? I take it to mean the same thing. You may not like that it carries with it a much…