Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    tycoon54
    Ty
    tycoon54

    I liked Samer’s translation of that better: “it makes no sense.”

    This depends on whether or not you have a high view of marriage. If man and wife do become “one” and strive to be “together” in all things (obviously not forgoing individuality) than what one spouse does reflects the other. They can have different opinions, but in terms of emotion, connection, beliefs, etc....it

    For everyone treating this person with disrespect...check your hypocritical morality for a second. If you really want to change the world to be a better place and make loving all types of people a cultural norm, then you would approach miseducation with class. Admittedly, I was horrified by the title of this article

    Uh, once he noticed something went on he immediately went towards the fray. What are you talking about?

    My feelings are so conflicted right now

    I need that shirt.

    “International superstar David Villa” ?

    YOU DONT GET THE SHOW

    I’m conflicted regarding Jon’s rebirth so early in the season. On the good hand it comes as a shock to viewers who knew Jon was coming back but expected it later. On the negative, it robs the viewers a look at the power struggle between Davos, Thorne, and Tormund and the emotional ups and downs of Melisandre’s coming

    I mean, sure, but still kinda easy. I would prefer fake Aegon to be real Aegon tbh

    Yeah but he realizes Tyrion’s competence, as he gives him important roles throughout the series that he absolutely does not have to. You can hate unjustifiably despite being a reasoned man.

    Yeah I could see the show using a “previously on” with that line if they want to explore Tyrion being Targ. Maybe with a Bran vision of the relationship or characters discussing it. I’m still not a huge fan of Tyrion being Targ though, I can’t buy 2 of the three dragons being products of Targ rape.

    If B&B give any shits about political realism this act should decimate Bolton relations with the Freys, Umbers, and Manderly’s. Maybe not the Manderly’s if show Manderly is different than book Manderly.

    Totally agree with the Karstark point. Makes absolutely no sense for a Lord Karstark to support the murder of Roose Bolton, the best chance at Northern stability (this side of hating the Starks for killing your father/uncle/whatever this Karstark is), which is their most important interest. Unless the Karstarks aim to

    no.

    I think we share the same sentiment

    Sure, I would never presume to walk up to someone that I don’t know or barely know to tell them they’re living wrong. The only time I’ve talked to lgbt people about the biblical view on sexuality in general is when lgbt friends of mine (some who are Christians, some not) ask for my advice. I mean, obviously not

    you should also probably read mainstream Christian theologians, scholars, and intellectuals rather than “christian” internet commenters and Westboro baptist.

    If your sexuality is your “existence,” then I feel bad for you, as you don’t have much to live for. My heterosexuality is not my existence. It’s a small, if important, part of me. Also, if someone honestly believes they have something that can help someone, then they should say it. If the person disagrees, then so be