“quasi” definitions are:
“to say that something is almost, but not completely, a particular type of thing”
And
“having some, but not all of the features of”

Pretty sure you didn’t need the word “quasi” in your description of the Daily Mail, it’s an absolute fascist spreader of hate rag! 

I like the line in the quoted article, “...the 22-year-old former public schoolboy...”

Reminder for readers in the US that the Daily Mail is less reliable than the weekly world news as a journalistic source - it’s a quasi-fascist rag that exists only to support old, racist, wealthy Brits and reassure their readers that everyone else is wrong and they are perfect.

Strange that all these conservatives complain about Muslims and how they treat women, are the same ones who want to treat women the same here.

The “if they’re Black” is silent. You know like the “b” in dumb.

This was essentially a hit. That dude was literally standing there, an unmarked vehicle pulls up with black tinted windows, homey walks up to it, then guys jump out with guns and he turns and runs and they shoot him in the back.

I suppose we’re about to hear from the assholes who will say that he brought it on himself by not knowing he was supposed to submit to some random asshole who rolled up on him?

I hope so. 1% of $10.5M x 40% contingency = 40k or so. It won’t even cover their costs.

Man, if only we could get these kinds of lawsuits going against firearms manufacturers, we’d be on the road to real firearm reform. Stall out the legislative process and bitch and whine about the 2nd amendment all you want, if Colt and S&W were getting their asses rightfully sued for all of the damage they facilitate,…

every “bad guy with a gun” was a “good guy with a gun” all the way until the moment they pulled the trigger

Makes sense to me, man.

The trade group estimated compliance would require at least $1.4 billion during the next 10 years, “driving up prices for consumers and making the car-buying process longer and more difficult.”

The part that gets me, is they count the 2 minutes as added labor/cost during the sale....but the same study says buyers will spend 3 hours LESS shopping....so aren’t sales people saving some time up front? I’d wager they save a lot more than 2 minutes on the front end.

What would cost them though? How is being factual in ads and such actually more expensive than being deceitful? Bottom line, the “cost” is truly just a loss of income from not being able to cheat the public.

Oh my god, this whole thing is so stupid. It’s not like they have to plow some ancient burial ground or knock over a cathedral. They just need to remove the span of the bridge for a few hours. Which they’ve already done. Which will be paid for generously.

I accidentally googled “money shot”: it’s not the same thing as “money shift” apparently.

Not just at planned Parenthood.

Not usually, there’s a video at the Madonna Inn in CA that gets thrown around repeatedly even though it was about 4 years ago and was at Thanksgiving - and some other factors leading to excessive crowding/waits.

Normalize ruining these assholes’ meals, bathroom breaks, gardening, grocery shopping, walks and daily lives.

Just remember:  It was all okay when the anti-mask/anti-vaccine morons were doing the same damn thing to politicians but ‘god’ forbid these right wing Nazi fucks can’t enjoy their dinner.  Nice double standards!