““three gorgeous dames in historical dresses gossiping.””

Well, if he’s a schizophrenic who will kill people he needs to be locked away, whether it’s prison or a mental hospital.

Cops frequently use this weird vocabulary when making official statements. Like they use sort-of correct words, but in weird ways.

I think that will only be a problem for evidence that pops up after the statements; like if another witness comes forward.

She’s lost several states to a self-proclaimed socialist who started campaigning literally years after she did. She has made amazingly bad gaffes (Nancy Reagan good on AIDS? Henry “Let’s carpet bomb children” Kissinger’s approval?). She started with ENORMOUS advantages over Sanders and you think the fact that she’s…

The infuriating thing about Hillary is for all her vaunted policy knowledge and sound judgment and history of leadership, she is incompetent at running her campaign. I am very, very worried that if Cruz wins the primary he will beat her in the general.

Yes!!! I watched it not too long ago and was kind of horrified about what a sociopath Cary Grant’s character was. And how the movie played the attempted suicide for that other poor woman for laughs.

Narcissists can’t apologize.

“Then Lauer brought up whether they should go to Rio because of the Zika virus, and Hope Solo pretty much shut him down.”

““Obviously this is a lot to sift through and some of it’s highly confidential, so apologies that I can’t go into tons of details,”” = Generous severance agreement. So good for her.

Good! Though make sure you’re checking for the “I Voted” sticker to make sure. I can forgive you your terrible choices in music and fashion but I cannot forgive anyone for President Trump.

Don’t freak out. Vote. And tell your friends to vote. Especially in swing states.

And a later comment is how hot the victim is.

Switch the genders around on the injured party and I’m going to guess the phrase “that’s speculation” wouldn’t be used.

Completely untrue.

The Democrats never refused to vote on a nominee for a vacancy that opened a year before the next President took office. Never.

I’m sure Garland had a very long discussion with the President and came into this with both eyes open.

Yes.

Scalia wrote the Crawford majority, so he is responsible for the controlling law, not Rehnquist’s concurrence. Scalia was also joined by every single other justice in the judgment, so you’d have to kill at least 5 judges.

“Confusingly, Sessions does not differentiate between the performed tricks of David Copperfield and actual supernatural powers of, say, Matilda, or voodoo queen Marie Laveau, or Sandra Bullock’s character in Practical Magic”