@giant_chibi: 'scool. I gotta say, it does look pretty "smooth" and by that I mean very "concept-y". But the thing that made me question was the lack of specific mention of it as concept.

@giant_chibi: Fair enough. I hadn't seen anywhere in the article that it was technically concept, which is why I brought it into question. It's the "cover" which is why I wasn't really sure exactly what it's supposed to be. (It's not often that we see concept art on the cover of a magazine, so you never know. Then…

@Duuuuuuude: And she actually goes along with it without hesitation, haha.

@SupaKero: Kevin Rose leaving Screen Savers was the last straw for me...

I was never a big fan of Cole's CLOTHING design, but...I liked that his face actually had character. It wasn't just a generic gritty hero, but a bit of a departure, making him feel a bit more real and human while making good and evil decisions along the way.

@gurfinki: Well, while this is clearly sarcastic, I will point out that that's part of the beauty of the characters in Shadow.

Damn it. I need FroYo to launch so I can wifi my damned PSP to my Droid!!!

Anyone feel like any of these games are actually worthwhile? I might consider GTPSP for that price, but...are any of the others particularly good games? How bout online play for the PSP ones?

@strange_headache: This. Dear God this.

I didn't think Tamagachi woule be one of the worst. But as tomsomething said, Furby definitely should have been.

Um...I, for one, would appreciate never seeing this screenshot to represent Heavy Rain again. It really doesn't represent the game very well, unfortunately.

@Karasu-kun: Too late. I'm part Irish and I already bought one. Or does it not count since I'm not 100%?

@Luke Plunkett: Isn't almost every character in almost every videogame some type of stereotype?

@selderane: Agreed. Perhaps AGGRESSIVE to try and sell a console at that point. But arrogant? I wouldn't have said so.

@SketchyIndividual: +1 for the zing.

I tend to disagree on this one, as I'm sure many others do.

I won't pay for it. And if free online gaming goes by the wayside, I will be removing myself from video games in general, because online gaming should be AT LEAST OPTIONALLY free.

@Britton: I would agree about A, but I figured I'd include it. The only reason it has a hint of possibility is based on the fact that, thus far, Sony/MS haven't said much about future consoles/development aside from that their current in-development projects (Move/Natal) are supposed to be revolutionizing and worthy…

@Britton: Not necessarily though. While $200 would be a steep price point, this text could easily be misleading.