turtleskinjamutantteenage
TeenageMutantKinjaTurtles
turtleskinjamutantteenage

It isn’t at all, actually. Are you one of those morons that conflates partisanship with political ideology, or independence with ideological “moderation”? I’m leftist, but don’t claim singular allegiance as a Democrat or to any other established party, i.e. entirely independent. Extremely simple concept.

Yeah, that’s the point where ol’ Flamajangles really jumped the fucking shark, if not long before. I’m sort of astounded no one had zeroed in on that before you.

Poe’s?

I’ll have to revisit this comment for further analysis after a brief rest but my gut impression is that GhostTrucker is insinuating Michael Anson is a fucking idiot?

J-Dog! From front to baa-aack!/J-Dog! B-b-b-buffalo wild wings!! (x8)

Daaaaaaaamn son! 

You sure are a great big ol’ dummy!  hehe~

Have you ever been laid? Is 12 upvotes on Kinja your life’s peak? And other rhetorical questions

Hurrka-hurr~!

Buuuuuwwwrrp~ 

What a weird assessment. Oh, so you mean likehorror” is sort of a vague and open-ended descriptor? In stark contrast to action/thriller/drama/comedy?No there isn’t an “excitement” As for describing “the nature of the xx”, that’s where subgenres come in and those apply to every genre including horror. The distinction

Jesus, what a fucking pussy

No totally not, well aside from the whole idiotic direct insinuation that if *your* (alleged) IRL film buff friends aren’t jazzed for this, then hey, clearly no one with an acute interest in film is. You do realize that your previous remarks on the matter weren’t written in disappearing ink and are still here, right?

Yes, your snark is lost on nobody, least of all me. The entire point is that your snark is laughably misguided and inappropriate, you fucking idiot. Pro-tip: When your snark requires a strawman retooling of your target’s position in order to “work”, it’s a fucking fail.

Well if you understood what she actually meant, your original comment completely betrays that fact. Instead you just harp on the supposedly obvious declaration that “subtracting the artier elements from an “art” film yields a regular old film”, when it’s obvious from context that the entire point of that remark is

Nah, Thants won that skirmish soundly

While it’s obvious from your scathing masterclass sarcasm you’re under the impression that you’re highlighting a glaringly obvious point that is lost on Ms. Rife, it’s clear she fundamentally disagrees with the notion that OG Suspiria is an art film to begin with, instead seeing it as a fairly straightforward genre

How exactly is the notion of a writer/director’s personal intentions “uninteresting”? Yeah, you’re going to have the expound on that, rather than just gloss over it in passing as though everyone is in inevitable fundamental agreement with you on that point.

Wat an edgelord

queeeeeef