The only appropriate response.
The only appropriate response.
I wonder if Trump is mad he didn’t think of it first.
Yeah. I read the book. Loved it. That’s why I was (poorly) trying to say it wasn’t quite like Buffy. I’m hesitant about this adaptation, because I don’t want it to do a disservice to the book (also somewhat hesitant but optimistic about the sequel).
True. This reminds me more of an MI6 + supernaturals or the British X-Men meets Bourne Identity.
Not really. Vampires exist in the story, but it’s not about vampires and there are many other supernatural beings than just vampires.
I’m pretty sure I’m not happy about this. I loved this book. I do not trust it in the hands of Meyer. I’m truly hoping she’ll prove me wrong though.
Sooo.... what is Take off your pants and jacket all about?
I’m the complete opposite. I usually wear contacts, and am hit or miss with whether or not I put on eye makeup (except mascara. ALWAYS mascara!!) But the days that I wear glasses, I definitely do up the eye makeup. I gotta make sure my eyes pop under that glass.
Gotcha. The actual press release states that they have managed to “functionally end veteran homelessness.” Federally, that has specific criteria - http://usich.gov/resources/uplo…
Connecticut ended chronic homeless, which is distinct from just homelessness. Not saying that CT’s efforts are minor. It’s a monumental thing, but even in that article you linked to, it states that...
There are actually a number of homeless people that choose to remain homeless for various reasons. I believe it’s a small minority of the homeless population, but they do exist.
I’m embarrased to admit how long it took me to realize they weren’t onions. I kept waiting for Kate to mention how the onions somehow perfectly complemented the apple cake.
Can Michael just go away already? I don’t care if Jane and Rafael end up together, I just need Michael to not be in the picture.
Kinja...
Actually, the OP just responded to someone else. He/she actually was talking about prose. I was wrong about being wrong and am still confused why I was structurally/grammatically a stupid sentence.
I misunderstood the commenter’s statement. I thought they were talking about sentence structure/grammar and not prison sentence.
The issue is stupid - agreed, but the commenter said the sentence was stupid. I assumed they were commenting specifically on the sentence, not the context of it.
If only the prison system was about rehabilitation....