tunaktun633
TunakTun633
tunaktun633

That was the speed where you shifted into second on the 2-speed semi-automatic Hondamatic. My mom had one of these, and it was a rather nice car, very economical, but it’s frame rusted to smithereens! I remember seeing one once about the mid ‘90's that had rusted it’s frame so badly that the drive wheels actually

And that poor little Fit is hidden behind the other cars, and shoved in the back, like the one friend everyone else in the group secretly hates but they feel bad because he has no other friends.

I think the opportunity to vote for “meh” ought to be added to the poll. It is neither so bad it is good, nor total shitcan, it was a meh. I voted shitcan in the absence of the meh option though.

David, if you want to give an FCA product a chance at redemption; discuss the FIAT 500. Not the Abarth, but a regular Sport, Pop, or Lounge. Some of the same faults as a Caliber, but with much more charm and merit.

The Caliber was shit. I drove one once when a family friend was in town and it was the worst car I’ve

Hmm.  Although nobody really claimed that the (sub GLH) Omni/Horizon was an thrill ride, and the company kept the platform around ‘way too long, it sold in great numbers, was a mostly American-built (still a big selling point with a lot of people back then) high-gas-mileage car just in time for the second wave of the

Test drove a manual R/T model a couple months back for my kid. It’s been a long time since I’ve rowed a shifter so imprecise. It was truly just aim where you think the gear should be and hope. Interior was abysmal, the car rode like shit, and the handling felt like someone had put big, wide, hard tires on a minivan.

Forget the HHR, what about the SSR? They were truly WTF.

Nailed it! That is the sedan we need!

I know exactly where they can start.

I think the buyer is missing the basic psychology here. Do you want a doctor who is your equal? Or do you want a doctor who is smarter than you? If I am hiring an architect, I definately want someone who has better taste than me. The Volvo, especially the interior, screams “architect’s car.” The Land Rover would also

Okay, just because a vehicle has a lift kit or some plastic cladding on its fenders doesn’t mean it’s a crossover. It’s all about the physical dimensions of a stationwagon that makes it, traditionally, a stationwagon: a sedan with a long roof and a tailgate.

Came for Crossover Anticrossover contact explosion joke per title.

You’re not going to win this argument. Every crossover has more headspace and a more upright seating position. They took a wagon and stretched it upwards. Crossover is more than just ground clearance.

The V60 is NOT a crossover. It’s a stationwagon. It’s a S60 sedan with a tailgate and longer roof. That’s it. It’s what a stationwagon, by its purest definition, is. Crossovers have tall cabins and typically short wheelbases to look more like a mini-SUV. You may be thinking of Volvo’s XC series; those are

If you’ve got a 2002 Volvo Cross Country in good condition, we’ll drive it.

Buick. TourX. Seriously, why is that not the comparison? Lower weight, higher HP, lovely exterior, good enough interior, and can be had for 25k. Wagonheads, unite!

I love Longroofs! Would much rather have a wagon than a SUV.

Audi is in top 5, believe it or not.

When my oil arrived there was a big scratch on the label. 1/5 stars. I have no thoughts on the quality of the oil itself.

Doubtful they are working together, and Toyota has stated the 86 will stay beneath the Supra. Which there is a chance the Supra will have a lower end 240hp 4banger model. Which leave the future of the 86 to remain remarkably similar to the car now or a MR2 model that will probably be remarkably similar to what we