tslayer
TSlayer
tslayer

Kinda funny how MGS1 gets to the list, more so that I consider it quite a feat to beat it under 10h on the first run, but other classics of the time, such as the Resident Evil-games and Silent Hill (1) do not get a mention, no matter how they’re easily 5-7h games .

Undeniably, completely, absolutely literally.

there’s absolutely zero reason for me to buy any of the current gen consoles. They literally, absolutely, have no games.

Dear click-bait shill writer: Fuck off.

This list reeks of shit taste AND horribly 2010’s casual generation.

Military and various universities had tons of technology way ahead of the civilian market stuff during the Cold War: Touch-screen interfaces, simulators running texturized and lit 3D graphics with AA running at 60fps, pen & tablet devices for creating computer graphics... All this, before 1980s.

You don’t need to pitch anything to Remedy. In fact, they’ve had ideas for sequels for years now, BUT they’ve been made literally incapable of creating more of these games. Microsoft considered the original game a disappointment sales-wise, and with the kinda poor financial state Remedy is at the moment, if their

A pointlessly long (opinion) article dedicated for one of THE most disappointing games, ever.

This kind of idiotic “articles” are the reason I give less and less credit or respect towards Slowtaku.

Never played Legend Of Zelda: Majora’s Mask, I assume?

it’s not cluttered mess at all.

“BLAA BLAA BLAA! IF YA GOT LIFE, YOU CAN’T ENJOY LONG GAMES ANYMORE!”

Everyone’s been wishing that for ages now, I wouldn’t put my money on it just yet. I mostly play on PC myself, but I seriously recommend getting a cheap PS3 + the MGS Legacy Collection. BAM - the whole series, in a single console, in beautiful HD, playable in very authentic form with all the control-tricks and other

I agree with you 100%. I’ve seen tons of flak for the first game’s controls, but I never had issues with them, and would take them over the crap #2 had, any day. My only explanation for the silly hate is the fact that the first game didn’t even try to be “modern” or compatible with consoles - it was a pure,

MGS2 is kinda controversial game in the series. Sure, it was a magnificent tech-demo for PS2’s capabilities back in the day, and it definitely has some interesting, philosophical questions and future predictions in its plot. It’s not exactly that much of a “chore” to play IMO, but it is quite clunky nowadays; I’d say

Personally, I gave the first Witcher a try after hearing some good stuff about it just couple years ago, and I loved it. I literally played it 4 times in a row within three months or so, experiencing and finding new stuff each run. After that I was really hyped for the very much praised sequel, but to my own shock I

I disagree 100%, and hate you. Witcher 1 was so far THE only game that controlled well, and got me completely engaged into the world, lore, and yes - gameplay as well. The sequel was just total crap, and clunky, consolized piece of shit.

yeah, it’s 2x more linear.

I seriously hope you spent that hour only AFTER having played the previous games already in the past. Having actually EXPERIENCED those events is totally different thing than reading about them; it’s pretty much the same thing as hearing it all being told by some “cool friend” during a bar night: sounds fucking insane

Witcher 2 is literally overrated, overhyped crap. I loved the first game to bits, playing it 4 times in a row (and still could go and have a go at it today), but the sequel was just dumbed down, consolized and clunky.