How much did they make?

I can't say that I agree. Most people, myself included, and you apparently, know that "there are plenty of reasons why you actually aren't able to respond. " and take that into account before thinking we're being ignored. It's nice to have a guarantee the iMessage was received, I can understand that people can't reply…

[ugh, double post.]

And probably start the next ice age or something due to the massive weather shifts it will cause.

there I fixed it for you

And you don't even post his WPM?

How much was the TV? I'd probably have fired it off a few times before asking about my TV's whereabouts.

Thanks, it was! All thanks to you!

WHAT! Why didn't I know about this!?!

Sincerely,

Well said.

Your points are all valid but you need to get upset about something with a bigger more ridiculous budget, like the Army, NASA's budget is insignificant and the money is well spent comparatively.

So you think freeze drying, water purification, solar energy, pollution remediation, food safety, infrared ear thermometers, ventricular assists devices, artificial limbs as well as many more technologies that were invented as a direct result of NASA research as well as all the jobs created to develop, manufacture and…

I completely agree. As I said in my comment, inductive charging is not any more useful than cord/dock charging until you can set the device on any 'powered' surface, anywhere on the surface and it charges.

'Not having to hunt down a cord to charge' is not a benefit of any current inductive charging implementation. I always keep my cord plugged into the same outlet, so hunting down my cord would be the exact same as hunting down my charging station.

So MastCam is the one that'll spot these little guys behind that rock.

LTE, more betterer camera (higher frame rate - slow mo, macro lens etc...), touch sensitive backing (would be awesome for scrolling without obstructing your view), Siri API so any app can use her... There are a tonne of things that could be added.

As CamJN said, the 5.1 screenshot is still on a taller 4" screen/resolution but it's just simulating iOS 5.1, an iPhone with a 3.5" screen has about the same amount of space between rows as the iOS 6 screenshot.

What, Apple not calling it an iPhone 5 or Gizmodo still calling it an iPhone 5?

I just copied the actual direct image link out of the bogus link Google throws into the address bar (what you copied/pasted) and pasted it into the 'ADD IMAGE' button above the comment box.