No love for Eyes of the Dragon? :)
No love for Eyes of the Dragon? :)
Agreed. This is the same shit that happens when conservatives say something dumb, the left pounces, and then conservatives go, “well...um...technically, if you look at the definition...”
When the landlord was asked why he wanted to gouge tenants and if he would would waive the need for first and last month’s rent, he responded, “F*** the world. Don’t ask me for s***. Anything you get you got to work hard for it.”
It’s going to happen. This push to move as far left as possible is going to get us Trump again, barring an economic collapse.
Let’s not forget this one:
If I’m in a book club with Pete, he’s finished with the book in a week and I’m two chapters in, showing up tipsy to discuss, and getting boat raced in a debate about a chapter that I didn’t read.
I watched Garfield: His 9 Lives way too many times as a kid. My life is a waste.
Presumably, you spent $5 on that nicer beer because you wanted to taste it.
No way! There is only one way to eat cereal and it involves heaping spoonfuls using a table spoon.
Why would he be a grey? Because he disagrees with your advocating murder in your post? Seems like a weird threshold to have.
Boo hoo, bitch! Go back to the Upper East Side and have a Negroni about it.
Ha. Yeah. Suicide.
They are “guaranteed” by the company so long as there is money to fund the pension payments. These pensions are dependent upon X% returns on an annual basis to retain enough funding to support their obligations. That’s why most pension funds are on the brink of disaster - they’ve been assuming unrealistic returns for…
Dumb question, but what is that Toyota van in the graphic “This is not cooler than this”?
Well, it turns out that the white man wasn’t just an ordinary white man with front row NBA Finals tickets; this white man is Warriors minority owner Mark Stevens.
Ha...yeah. I think a lot of times, it’s a function of the person being self absorbed like the rules don’t apply to them or they simply shouldn’t be behind a wheel.
If it was double turn lanes, she still shouldn’t be over in his path to take hist right turn.
Here’s the part of this whole thing that has me going nuts. The lady was quoted as saying, “We are both turning right — people are still crossing,” she said. “So what happened is we’re both turning right. But I know he hit me because I was already [turning]. I was there, he was the one who hit me!”
This is astoundingly wrong. Minis fuck up the peanut butter to chocolate ratio!
I come to this site every day hoping to not see people of similar skin tone as me doing ill shit, and every time I’m left thinking, “OH COME THE FUCK ON.”